Like what could he do in advance? If the courts said he had no standing after the election to challenge it, they would have said he had no standing to challenge before the election because he had not suffered damages yet. Plus, state courts in places like PA are Democrat run, and they will get the result they want regardless of how creative they need to get with the legal process.
Like what could he do in advance? If the courts said he had no standing after the election to challenge it, they would have said he had no standing to challenge before the election because he had not suffered damages yet. Plus, state courts in places like PA are Democrat run, and they will get the result they want regardless of how creative they need to get with the legal process.
Your points make total sense. But, how will anyone do anything to fix it ever, then? There must be a way, is all I'm saying.