4301
Comments (287)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
37
OlLadyPede 37 points ago +37 / -0

Jack doesn't care about drop in revenue. His friends in Congress will glady help with some bailout cash. What Jack cares about is people thinking Twitter is relevant for news and social commentary. If you are logging on, if you keep your accounts active, its power for Jack and crew. In high school terms, Jack's a cool kid, because he decides who sits at his cool table. Jack just shit his pants picking on the real cool kid. Jack wants us to not notice his poop pants so we would still want to sit at his table. Dont sit with shitty pants Jack. Myspace his ass.

9
Desktop 9 points ago +9 / -0

Jack may not care but stockholders do.

5
OlLadyPede 5 points ago +5 / -0

As long as Jack can show interaction with the platform, he can hold the shareholders at bay waiting on his bailout

3
Cmchn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even if they get the money, they can't brainwash us if people aren't using it.

2
PurgeTheWoke 2 points ago +2 / -0

Congress is not going to bail them out.

2
Terriblesubreddit1 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the excuse for banning conservatives is “it’s a private company, they can do what they want”. Then they should be entitled to $0 of government money, period. They can be as free as they want

1
Basedsliceofwinning 1 point ago +1 / -0

Twitter doesn't currently have any economically viable competition. They just got their competition banned with little effort. They have no worry of government monopoly investigations, and 50% of the country applauded their effort.

While I of course, hate Twitter, I gotta figure they don't care too much about a temporary drop in Market Cap.

That being said, if we get any legal idea of inundating them with letters that require response, or anything like that, absolutely lets do it.