3557
Comments (62)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
23
BasedBurckhardt 23 points ago +23 / -0

It'll be the second one. Even more sinister is they'll shamelessly claim any Democrat losses are the result of fraud while telling you you're crazy if you claim it is fraud when a Republican loses, no matter the concrete evidence.

What's crazy is they believe it's actually true. They take it as an article of faith that everyone is really on their side and so Republicans winning a tight election is, to them, actual proof of fraud.

6
spezisacuckold 6 points ago +6 / -0

The thing is I would be COMPLETELY fine with Biden if he actually won the presidency fair and square.

Except he didn’t.

And Democrats and GOPe have fought absolute tooth and nail to stop a simple AUDIT. Like what the actual fuck?!?

And this has been PROVEN that Biden didn’t win. There are very obvious state election reforms that clearly and explicitly went against their own constitutions and which weren’t put into place by their state legislatures. If these state constitutions (and the federal constitution) were actually enforced then Trump would rightfully be declared the winner. Just on that alone. That doesn’t even touch on the literally dozens of other methods of fraud that were pulled off, of which we also have receipts.

2
BasedBurckhardt 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would be deeply disappointed in the poor judgement of many of my countrymen if Biden won legitimately. But I would have to accept it.

In this case, we don't need any more evidence than the efforts to prevent transparency to make an adverse inference that they pulled some shady shit they don't want found.

At minimum, we can't know who won decisively. The process has been spoiled too badly.