They can make a state law all they want, because when presenting the electoral results and any certifications to the fed for theor votes to count nationally, they follow federal law and must disclose any audit data.
I get the whole idea that some states want to use sovereignty as a crutch, but it should be illegal to outright hinder the rest of the federation with local laws. Illegal as in 'You can't participate or benefit by the federation or federal funding until this is rectified' kind of illegal.
It wouldn't be illegal by state law, but it would by federal law. I don't care what a dumb state does because I can choose not to live there or visit there. I only care when it breaches the state boundaries.
My point being that 99% of federal & state judges and 100% of the WA Supreme Court judges are corrupt communists. They won’t ever allow a case to go forward if it favors the U.S. Constitution or conservative principles. Therefore “not illegal” to them.
They can make a state law all they want, because when presenting the electoral results and any certifications to the fed for theor votes to count nationally, they follow federal law and must disclose any audit data.
I get the whole idea that some states want to use sovereignty as a crutch, but it should be illegal to outright hinder the rest of the federation with local laws. Illegal as in 'You can't participate or benefit by the federation or federal funding until this is rectified' kind of illegal.
It’s not illegal if every judge in the state refuses to see it that way.
It wouldn't be illegal by state law, but it would by federal law. I don't care what a dumb state does because I can choose not to live there or visit there. I only care when it breaches the state boundaries.
My point being that 99% of federal & state judges and 100% of the WA Supreme Court judges are corrupt communists. They won’t ever allow a case to go forward if it favors the U.S. Constitution or conservative principles. Therefore “not illegal” to them.