Comments (67)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
mimefortheblind 4 points ago +4 / -0

The fact that you insist on "proof texting" as opposed to relying on the recieved tradition is a good argument that you not only have free will but are abusing the privilege.

-5
ListenCarefully [S] -5 points ago +1 / -6

May it never be! Rather, let God be found true, though every man be found a liar, as it is written, “That You may be justified in Your words, And prevail when You are judged.” — Romans 3:4

His words on the topic are all that matter, the opinions and philosophies of men don't deserve the trust of anyone.

3
mimefortheblind 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here's the problem that is obvious to everyone else: It's not "his words" it's "your filter".

I never met him but in my youth I knew people who knew David Koresh. You sound a lot like him. Normal people in real religions have some buffer between what the religion teaches them and what they imagine to be true. It's keeps them on an even keel and prevents them from going on the internet and proclaiming that they have the one true inside dope and everyone else going to hell.

This is why there are no Methodist suicide bombers or Lutheran terrorist cells.

Now, Christians DO believe in a concept called the "scandal of particularity" which holds the Jesus is the only way to be saved. But in Christianity, this is an occasion for great humility and a desire to love one's neighbor not an excuse to get rowdy on the internet.

-2
ListenCarefully [S] -2 points ago +1 / -3

I don't see a verse anywhere.

2
mimefortheblind 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let's go very, very, slowly.... I don't actually disagree with you. At least not in the most technical sense. Your methodology for getting there is dangerous. Starting this fight here is an embarrassment. Those are my concerns.