78
Comments (8)
sorted by:
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Justice101pt2 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol, It's not my best work. did it in about 2 minutes with explanation to my girlfriend who is a leftist. I actually was hoping people had thoughts on how to improve.

want to show for people who are not very savvy that for an election not to need audits the margin between candidates should be larger than possible "glitches" or fraud by a statistically significant margin.

Doing it while in a fight about breaking up with her at the same time so didn't put much care into this.

My Bad :)

2
estn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agree with original comment.

Rule of thumb you shouldn't have to explain it to your audience; they should be able to quicky understand and grasp it. Strive for that goal.

  1. Columns instead of Bars
  2. Remove the Distribution function of irregularities. Replace with a simple band of the range to communicate that an audit should occur based on margin. The band is easier to understand and avoids people shutting down when you introduce Stats.
1
watchman4u 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you read 1984? if not you should we ARE IN IT!! Also If you never listen to Yuri Bezmenov you need to many times so much in his lectures I get something out of them each time i reListen.

3
Justice101pt2 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have read it and listened to Yuri. Both seem unfortunately prophetic.

I can't tell if it's laziness/cowardice (don't want to stir the pot) or if some people are just too slow to grasp what's going on around them.

I hope it's neither in the long run. I willing to, but don't want to turn into some sort of freedom fighter.

1
IamQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

I firmly believe team trump ensured nothing corrected the fraud. It had to go to this.... I thinks the q lines are bring the country to its knees.... and walk through the dark before the light

1
IamQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is it possible the white hats stole the election themselves???

1
Justice101pt2 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think there is a simple white hat vs. black hat story. The Q stuff brings hope to a lot of people and has enough shards of truth that some things are believable, but even if it is true, trusting the plan also takes agency away from "we the people." I do like the philosophy of leaving crumbs for people to come to their own conclusions, but I think resolving the deep seeded problems in our society requires more engagement from individuals and not just once on a regular basis so that we don't end up with a swamp again in the near future.