Most of the stuff it's about is a pedo ring / deep state right?
That was already blown open with the Epstein / Clinton / Prince Andrew stuff.
And we saw the deepstate in full force the past few years.
I guess it's whether you believe the one guy posting this (confirmed one via hashes) but why not, it's why they seem to always reference it and ask about it in the news. I heard about it from reporters asking about it, treating it like a joke, but they always ask people to deny it.
I dunno. Maybe the time Q said that Sessions was still secretly on Trump's side even after Trump tweeted shit about him? Or that the ballots in the election had an invisible watermark to prove real ballots vs fake ballots? Or the supposed belief that Biden being inaugurated is all part of "the plan"?
Q has the basic beliefs we do such as Hollywood having a massive pedo ring, the existence of a deep state, etc. But his claims such as in the above paragraph are what makes him who he is--a liar who speaks to the supporters of ours who are so dumb that I think they're equivalent to the SJW "infinite genders" leftists.
To be perfectly fair, Sessions started the Epstein investigation and busted a record number of pedos, He also wanted to ban H1Bs from the very beginning, something that wasn't done until the 4th year of Trump's admin.
Leftists believe that "fake news" is only on the right and that it presents a mortal danger to them. Thus the drive for total censorship. Q perhaps especially bothers them because they see that much of it is bullshit. Also, the Left started their censorship campaign with easy targets that were not uniformly defended by all those on the right, such as Alex Jones and Q. That progressed until they felt safe to censor the President of the United States.
I had only heard of Q in passing, until really low info libs started telling me “you’re drinking the Q koolaid” I had to wonder where they were getting that from, since like I said, these particular people are extremely low info, and only watch basic MSM propaganda news, like CNN & MSNPC. So, those channels must mention it, which means maybe they fear Q?
Twitter helped create the word QANON for the public. They put two separate and very different groups of people in one 'deplorable basket' to build a lie to the public.
Q is one person/group.
Before anti-Trump media, Anons were people from 4channel; loony (and sometimes wickedly smart), many different topics, not specifically political.
Media has taken the 4channel Anon's reputation, and tied it to Q and Q followers.
FYI for clarity: "Q" is the entity. An "anon" is anyone on the internet basically. "Q anon" is not an official group, but it's how people refer to the collection of people who theorize about Q's posts.
You clearly don’t know what you’re talking about if you think it’s people finding clouds shaped like bunnies. Maybe get that ego in check and realize you don’t know what you don’t know.
Most people don't, but what @Jack(ass) and the fake media are trying to do is push the narrative that all conservatives are Q Anons. "Crazy conspiracy theorists" that have been driven to violence and terrorism by Q, and the virtuous leftists need to "re-educate the half of the country that's been brainwashed by conspiracies".
Typical leftist upside-down world. I've already seen a couple articles about celebs accusing each other of being Q Anon simply for using Parler; they're really pushing the narrative hard.
I dont really believe in the Q ANON thing but the fact dorsey mentions him and wants to censor him triggers my deductive reasoning skills, hmmm
Yeah I totally agree. I never even knew what the whole Q thing was until people started to talk shit about it. Even some people here.
Some of it is way out there, but dang, I won't dismiss things because of how wild they seem anymore. I'm keeping an open mind for sure.
An open mind is the right approach on anything
Or pedophilia.
Even communism. Open mind does not mean acceptance. You must understand why normal people fall into the trap of communism to defeat it.
Yes, just not so open that your brains fall out.
"The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid."
I mean, what's not to believe.
Most of the stuff it's about is a pedo ring / deep state right?
That was already blown open with the Epstein / Clinton / Prince Andrew stuff.
And we saw the deepstate in full force the past few years.
I guess it's whether you believe the one guy posting this (confirmed one via hashes) but why not, it's why they seem to always reference it and ask about it in the news. I heard about it from reporters asking about it, treating it like a joke, but they always ask people to deny it.
I dunno. Maybe the time Q said that Sessions was still secretly on Trump's side even after Trump tweeted shit about him? Or that the ballots in the election had an invisible watermark to prove real ballots vs fake ballots? Or the supposed belief that Biden being inaugurated is all part of "the plan"?
Q has the basic beliefs we do such as Hollywood having a massive pedo ring, the existence of a deep state, etc. But his claims such as in the above paragraph are what makes him who he is--a liar who speaks to the supporters of ours who are so dumb that I think they're equivalent to the SJW "infinite genders" leftists.
To be perfectly fair, Sessions started the Epstein investigation and busted a record number of pedos, He also wanted to ban H1Bs from the very beginning, something that wasn't done until the 4th year of Trump's admin.
So don't follow his word like he's God, he may or may not have inside info, he also likes to assume and LARP, he's human.
My point was isn't the general QAanon theory about a deepstate pedo ring?
I wouldn't put too much into the guy himself, we already have proof of the above core theory.
Why would the media be so concerned about it? True or not... what is their big worry?
Leftists believe that "fake news" is only on the right and that it presents a mortal danger to them. Thus the drive for total censorship. Q perhaps especially bothers them because they see that much of it is bullshit. Also, the Left started their censorship campaign with easy targets that were not uniformly defended by all those on the right, such as Alex Jones and Q. That progressed until they felt safe to censor the President of the United States.
I had only heard of Q in passing, until really low info libs started telling me “you’re drinking the Q koolaid” I had to wonder where they were getting that from, since like I said, these particular people are extremely low info, and only watch basic MSM propaganda news, like CNN & MSNPC. So, those channels must mention it, which means maybe they fear Q?
It is sad, but I default to everything being false flag, psyop bullshit until it can be proven otherwise.
Twitter helped create the word QANON for the public. They put two separate and very different groups of people in one 'deplorable basket' to build a lie to the public.
Q is one person/group.
Before anti-Trump media, Anons were people from 4channel; loony (and sometimes wickedly smart), many different topics, not specifically political.
Media has taken the 4channel Anon's reputation, and tied it to Q and Q followers.
Interesting. Thank you clarifying.
FYI for clarity: "Q" is the entity. An "anon" is anyone on the internet basically. "Q anon" is not an official group, but it's how people refer to the collection of people who theorize about Q's posts.
And there are fake Qs larping for attention.
Q is verified thru the unique hash in his submissions. The hash is generated one-way thru a password.
Some people (me) dont know that.
Edit: and I usually pride myself on details like that.
Q has changed id many times, and usually had that id confirmed by deltas and typos..
Good to know.
And CIA fakes discrediting every Qanon
You clearly don’t know what you’re talking about if you think it’s people finding clouds shaped like bunnies. Maybe get that ego in check and realize you don’t know what you don’t know.
These days everything that is censored should be considered reliable source.
Except MSM.
Most people don't, but what @Jack(ass) and the fake media are trying to do is push the narrative that all conservatives are Q Anons. "Crazy conspiracy theorists" that have been driven to violence and terrorism by Q, and the virtuous leftists need to "re-educate the half of the country that's been brainwashed by conspiracies".
Typical leftist upside-down world. I've already seen a couple articles about celebs accusing each other of being Q Anon simply for using Parler; they're really pushing the narrative hard.
I personally know an anti-trumper (not TDS level) who is into Q.
How can you be an anti trumper and be into Q?
I have no idea haha. Maybe he just has to claim being anti-trump. Didn't probe further.