Baron2052 the fate of the republic what if: all patriots got together hamlet by town and figured out how to be self sufficient and then connected with the next town all across beautiful america we would discover we are a self sufficient nation and do not need to share one dime with traitors to us the people and to the constitution.
2nd ammenment would pretty important to turn the border crossers and chinsese back to go sort out their own country
How about The Federalist Papers, the arguments for the foundations of our government. These are the documents that constitutional lawyers read when determining the intent of sentences in the Constitution.
Constururion is pretty clear. Anyone struggling to interpret cant understand plain fucking english. Legalese was invented to cloud it and make it useless. our syste. Is a self inflicted wound. Get lawyers.the fuck.out of everything. Dirty greedy dou hebags
It's a good story but John Ross must have been jerking off half the time he was writing it. I read it several years ago and I lost count of how many unnecessary sex scenes there were.
The republic aside, the fate of the world right now rests on fighting Big Tech and the media. Free speech needs to be had. At this point they have international propaganda machines where they can choose which things are seen and which are not and by who, keeping people addicted to them and creating their own echo chamber across all channels.
I’m all for 230 reform but at this point I’d also be fine with just removing 230. That’d pretty much bring down this site but if we brought social media down with us it’d be worth it.
The only way to defeat big tech is to avoid all their services if possible and sell your nasdaq stocks. If their stock goes down they lose their ability to buy up the competition cheaply. Myspace was once the market leader and now no one uses it.
I completely acknowledge this forum/site is propaganda. That’s partly why I said removing 230 would bring down this site. You would be banned for saying you don’t support Trump here. The issue isn’t people expressing view points or even the occasional theory. The issue is false claims of objectivity and collusion between infinite outlets to make echo chambers of things that aren’t true and preventing any dissent or disagreement within that echo chamber.
This site very openly states that it’s propaganda. CNN, Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, The Washing Post and The New York Times do not. They and more form an international echo chamber that reifies facts into being and prevents any conflicting information from getting out. They also merged with the government.
PEOPLE WHO THINK REMOVING 230 MAKES THINGS BETTER HAVE NO IDEA WHAT WOULD ACTUALLY HAPPEN. ONLINE RULES WOULD BECOME FAR MORE STRICT. ZERO TOLERANCE. ALLOWING DISCUSSION WOULD BECOME A LIABILITY. THEREFORE, NOT A SINGLE DISCUSSION FORUM WOULD OPERATE OUT OF FEAR OF LEGAL LIABILITY. INCLUDING THIS ONE. ONLY THE BIG GUYS COULD AFFORD TO CONTINUE.
I'm with Styx on this; Article 230 needs an overhaul at the least. Simply eliminating without a suitable replacement would be like the opening of Indiana Jones when he swaps out the idol for a bag of sand.
I don't think it would. The site clearly states what it is and who it is for and is not a social media site per se. It does not purport to be objective or impartial. Social media does and is the tech equivalent of the town square where diverse people assemble to air their views expectant of an equal opportunity to do so.
So what is the fate of the Republic now?
Baron2052 the fate of the republic what if: all patriots got together hamlet by town and figured out how to be self sufficient and then connected with the next town all across beautiful america we would discover we are a self sufficient nation and do not need to share one dime with traitors to us the people and to the constitution. 2nd ammenment would pretty important to turn the border crossers and chinsese back to go sort out their own country
Read the book "The Last President" Written in 1887
Is that a real book
Yes my neighbor bought for her mom. I'm waiting to read it next.
The author is Ingersoll Lockwood.
Yes, I Vetted it. Just look it up. The Adventures of Baron Trump is also real. Good question though.
Is Trump a time traveler? Yes it’s real.
How about The Federalist Papers, the arguments for the foundations of our government. These are the documents that constitutional lawyers read when determining the intent of sentences in the Constitution.
Constururion is pretty clear. Anyone struggling to interpret cant understand plain fucking english. Legalese was invented to cloud it and make it useless. our syste. Is a self inflicted wound. Get lawyers.the fuck.out of everything. Dirty greedy dou hebags
Yes. Unfortunately it ends with the President losing power after a commie is elected.
My take is if true then it means all that come next are puppets not presidents.
Obama, Clinton, bush...all puppets already. The evil has been interrupted.
How much different is that from before, I ask?
Also Unintended Consequences, by John Ross
Can you help us with a summary?
It's a good story but John Ross must have been jerking off half the time he was writing it. I read it several years ago and I lost count of how many unnecessary sex scenes there were.
ok I will, thanks
Wow we really do have some dark day's coming don't we.
Some say it may be a dark winter others “The Awakening”.
I'm hoping on Awakening, just feels like all I got left is hope.
Biden camp said that.. what a fuckung great leader
Summer patriots vs winter soldiers. Who will be which is about to be discovered.
It is for a lot of the world, China really fucked up this planet
the darkest
better than genocide & survivors slaves to the CCP brought in my bought US politicos
This is where I’m at
by bought not my
SOUNDS LIKE COMMUNISM TO ME.
I think they tried this in 1861. Did not work.
Eminent domain
Highway Robbery
Trump a big supporter. Just saying.
The republic aside, the fate of the world right now rests on fighting Big Tech and the media. Free speech needs to be had. At this point they have international propaganda machines where they can choose which things are seen and which are not and by who, keeping people addicted to them and creating their own echo chamber across all channels.
I’m all for 230 reform but at this point I’d also be fine with just removing 230. That’d pretty much bring down this site but if we brought social media down with us it’d be worth it.
The only way to defeat big tech is to avoid all their services if possible and sell your nasdaq stocks. If their stock goes down they lose their ability to buy up the competition cheaply. Myspace was once the market leader and now no one uses it.
Boycotts work
Look on the bright side; Murdoch came a cropper on that buy in. LoL
I completely acknowledge this forum/site is propaganda. That’s partly why I said removing 230 would bring down this site. You would be banned for saying you don’t support Trump here. The issue isn’t people expressing view points or even the occasional theory. The issue is false claims of objectivity and collusion between infinite outlets to make echo chambers of things that aren’t true and preventing any dissent or disagreement within that echo chamber.
This site very openly states that it’s propaganda. CNN, Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, The Washing Post and The New York Times do not. They and more form an international echo chamber that reifies facts into being and prevents any conflicting information from getting out. They also merged with the government.
PEOPLE WHO THINK REMOVING 230 MAKES THINGS BETTER HAVE NO IDEA WHAT WOULD ACTUALLY HAPPEN. ONLINE RULES WOULD BECOME FAR MORE STRICT. ZERO TOLERANCE. ALLOWING DISCUSSION WOULD BECOME A LIABILITY. THEREFORE, NOT A SINGLE DISCUSSION FORUM WOULD OPERATE OUT OF FEAR OF LEGAL LIABILITY. INCLUDING THIS ONE. ONLY THE BIG GUYS COULD AFFORD TO CONTINUE.
I'm with Styx on this; Article 230 needs an overhaul at the least. Simply eliminating without a suitable replacement would be like the opening of Indiana Jones when he swaps out the idol for a bag of sand.
Why would it bring down this site
We don’t have connections. Any site with people posting on it would be immediately hit by infinite lawsuits.
TRUE THAT.
I don't think it would. The site clearly states what it is and who it is for and is not a social media site per se. It does not purport to be objective or impartial. Social media does and is the tech equivalent of the town square where diverse people assemble to air their views expectant of an equal opportunity to do so.