Not necessarily. Arrest can mean a wide variety of things. Arrest just means being prevented from doing something. What that something is - that's the curious part. Normally, the thing you are prevented from doing when arrested is going anywhere, you are detained for questioning in connection with a crime. Problem is, if Pelosi is arrested, they already know exactly what she did and don't need to question her on anything. If Trump did have Nancy arrested, but wants to keep up the illusion of everything being fine (for whatever reason, whether that be to fool the public or to fool his enemies or something else entirely), this is exactly what he would do - have her go about her day like everything is normal, let her put on her sham little impeachment show, but have agents following her every move and preventing her from doing anything of real consequence. It would also explain her mysterious two-day absence from the House floor a few days ago as they drafted the impeachment articles which Nancy called for - she could have been arrested arrested, questioned and the like (maybe spilled some secrets in a plea bargain?), and temporarily released on the condition she gets a little "security" detail and behaves.
Let me just get this straight. She is "arrested" in a manner that appears like typical security to fool us and her colleagues, yet a number of internet users through a simple picture alone have discovered she is arrested without her colleagues discovering it? Also Nancy Pelosi is SO cooperative that she is going along with the "secret planned arrest" and no one of any importance has discovered it.
I guess it's just like Mccains arrest, Hillarys arrest, and Bidens arrest. All of them were arrested according to the Q following but were simultaneously free to do whatever they wanted. Is there ever a point where you guys admit that you were wrong and these people were never under arrest to begin with, or does it last until they die of old age and then its claimed that they were "Executed secretly"?
I'm not denying the absurdity of any theory nor the veracity of the OP's claim, I'm merely pointing out that "arrest" in the context does not mean exactly what you suggested. No need for hostility, pede, we are all in the same boat, and no need for infighting between Q people and non-Q people. We are all Trump supporters and patriots, and that's all that matters.
I don't believe I said anything that was hostile, I am legitimately trying to understand at what point its proven to be false for people who believe this. I do however want to say that there is never a situation where someone is legally arrested and allowed to move freely and go about their daily lives like Pelosi is.
You can be arrested and then released, but then you are no longer arrested. What you described is cooperation with authorities, and if it were the case she would still not be considered "under arrest" like the people putting out this fantasy are claiming. You simply can not be under arrest if you are not in custody and restrained, Pelosi is not in custody and restrained at all unless you believe what we are seeing is a hologram (yes someone has claimed both Pelosi and the Pope are detained and what we have been seeing for the past year are holograms).
Not necessarily. Arrest can mean a wide variety of things. Arrest just means being prevented from doing something. What that something is - that's the curious part. Normally, the thing you are prevented from doing when arrested is going anywhere, you are detained for questioning in connection with a crime. Problem is, if Pelosi is arrested, they already know exactly what she did and don't need to question her on anything. If Trump did have Nancy arrested, but wants to keep up the illusion of everything being fine (for whatever reason, whether that be to fool the public or to fool his enemies or something else entirely), this is exactly what he would do - have her go about her day like everything is normal, let her put on her sham little impeachment show, but have agents following her every move and preventing her from doing anything of real consequence. It would also explain her mysterious two-day absence from the House floor a few days ago as they drafted the impeachment articles which Nancy called for - she could have been arrested arrested, questioned and the like (maybe spilled some secrets in a plea bargain?), and temporarily released on the condition she gets a little "security" detail and behaves.
Let me just get this straight. She is "arrested" in a manner that appears like typical security to fool us and her colleagues, yet a number of internet users through a simple picture alone have discovered she is arrested without her colleagues discovering it? Also Nancy Pelosi is SO cooperative that she is going along with the "secret planned arrest" and no one of any importance has discovered it.
I guess it's just like Mccains arrest, Hillarys arrest, and Bidens arrest. All of them were arrested according to the Q following but were simultaneously free to do whatever they wanted. Is there ever a point where you guys admit that you were wrong and these people were never under arrest to begin with, or does it last until they die of old age and then its claimed that they were "Executed secretly"?
I'm not denying the absurdity of any theory nor the veracity of the OP's claim, I'm merely pointing out that "arrest" in the context does not mean exactly what you suggested. No need for hostility, pede, we are all in the same boat, and no need for infighting between Q people and non-Q people. We are all Trump supporters and patriots, and that's all that matters.
I don't believe I said anything that was hostile, I am legitimately trying to understand at what point its proven to be false for people who believe this. I do however want to say that there is never a situation where someone is legally arrested and allowed to move freely and go about their daily lives like Pelosi is.
You can be arrested and then released, but then you are no longer arrested. What you described is cooperation with authorities, and if it were the case she would still not be considered "under arrest" like the people putting out this fantasy are claiming. You simply can not be under arrest if you are not in custody and restrained, Pelosi is not in custody and restrained at all unless you believe what we are seeing is a hologram (yes someone has claimed both Pelosi and the Pope are detained and what we have been seeing for the past year are holograms).