Could mean hes calling out that those violent at the capitol most weren't likely to been actual Trump supporters and also possible future planned attacks by antifa dressed as Trump supporters aren't either and are enemies of state therefore terrorists. Which also means he has no choice but to word it this way and sorta denounce some trump supporters involved in Capitol in order to take antifa down. He seemed very pressed to make certain distinctions past few videos of Trump, Whitehouse etc like it would come into play later. Some might say it was to try and avoid Impeachment but this was released after it. Might be a spin might be hopium but its what ima choose to interpret it as.
<-----continues to smoke some more hopium. lol. Well I meant for the initial House hearing thing but I still feel much of my interpretation has some standing. I mean yeah it can sound bad I fully understand. Just trying to be positive and also pass it along.
He's covering his and MAGA asses for the incoming FBI false flags on the 20th.
Hi, CBS, you gonna take a turn setting a pipe bomb this time, or does CNN have dibs on starting shit since you put explosive charges in that SUV from a gillion years ago?
Probably a distinction he has to make in order to establish and stand on the views that we are a party of Law and Order. Not to say I disagree. Law enforcement have disappointed greatly in recent events.
Laws, like the ones against looting, arson, rape, great bodily harm, vandalism, murder, or declaring an autonomous zone, or gutting a police department? Those laws?
Or domestic spying on your campaign by the FBI?
Laws are NOW for killing and jailing conservatives only.
Sounds like hes setting up to take down antifa.
Well, the raging leftists aren't fellow Americans, so...
Could mean hes calling out that those violent at the capitol most weren't likely to been actual Trump supporters and also possible future planned attacks by antifa dressed as Trump supporters aren't either and are enemies of state therefore terrorists. Which also means he has no choice but to word it this way and sorta denounce some trump supporters involved in Capitol in order to take antifa down. He seemed very pressed to make certain distinctions past few videos of Trump, Whitehouse etc like it would come into play later. Some might say it was to try and avoid Impeachment but this was released after it. Might be a spin might be hopium but its what ima choose to interpret it as.
He still doesn't want to be indicted of his impeachment.
<-----continues to smoke some more hopium. lol. Well I meant for the initial House hearing thing but I still feel much of my interpretation has some standing. I mean yeah it can sound bad I fully understand. Just trying to be positive and also pass it along.
I mostly agree with you, though :P Just trying to lay out all possibilities!
Fist bump*
He's covering his and MAGA asses for the incoming FBI false flags on the 20th.
Hi, CBS, you gonna take a turn setting a pipe bomb this time, or does CNN have dibs on starting shit since you put explosive charges in that SUV from a gillion years ago?
Communists aren't people, and non people aren't American.
Also law enforcement is completely unrespectable after the sixth. Bunch of order following retards with guns.
My nutless dog is more American than most of the Left.
Probably a distinction he has to make in order to establish and stand on the views that we are a party of Law and Order. Not to say I disagree. Law enforcement have disappointed greatly in recent events.
Good thing lefties aren't Americans.
And “no law enforcement could ever hurt or disrespect Americans” ....oh wait it’s no longer true when you flip It.
This has to be one of the most stupid replies I ever read.
Laws, like free, fair voting?
Laws, like the ones against looting, arson, rape, great bodily harm, vandalism, murder, or declaring an autonomous zone, or gutting a police department? Those laws?
Or domestic spying on your campaign by the FBI?
Laws are NOW for killing and jailing conservatives only.
Laws when there's order . When there's order there's good laws. When not , I agree.