5810
Comments (496)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
Flptplt 2 points ago +11 / -9

Are these people ever not being victimized? They need to have a much higher threat posture than they do. No excuse for them to not be armed and ready to defend themselves at all times.

10
Dan_D_Lion 10 points ago +11 / -1

Walking dog while 71 and deaf.

Shoved down and beaten by an attacker she probably never saw or heard.

With her finely aged reflexes and situational awareness she totes could have protected herself with a gun and came out the hero.

Real world here. You >>>> there.

2
iDinduNuffin 2 points ago +4 / -2

There's been 90 year olds that did that. But if you're actually defenseless, what's the next best way to protect yourself? Don't go out by yourself to walk your dog like you're living in 1950's suburbia.

I'm tired of all the delusional people on our side clinging to some comfortable idea of life instead of confronting the problem. Why is anybody still surprised when this kind of shit happens?

4
Dan_D_Lion 4 points ago +5 / -1

Stop using delusional in the same sentence that suggests a 71 year old deaf political target has the means to individually protect herself. Absurd.

Gun or not, give me a bike and the flu against a 71 year old deaf woman. 1000:1 odds I win whether or not she has a gun. Odds climb exponentially if I've surveilled common movement/route.

It's hard for you to accept fellow patriots that cling to the idea of a comfortable life while..... you do the same exact thing.

You aren't a political target. No one gives a shit about you. But please. Tell us how the Stones and other politically targeted individuals should protect themselves while you exist in a world that no one even knows about.

Murrr durrr a gun would have protected her!

Big brain missing the big picture.

2
iDinduNuffin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just told you her means to protect herself: Don't walk around alone like it's the 1950's. The fact she's a mainstream political target should make it even more obvious. But having a gun is better either way.

Also wake the fuck up, there are entire cities in this country where I wouldn't be able to "walk my dog", purely because of my skin color. Put on a MAGA hat and it's a lot worse. We are all political targets. Deranged retards like this guy would have done the exact same to you without a second thought. It's time to leave fantasyland, like another comment said.

2
TrumpAndGodWin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Safety in numbers, it shouldn't be this way, but it is for now. Imagine a video of a bunch of old people beating a thug with canes.

1
hewhoblitzzz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Savage

3
IncredibleMrE1 3 points ago +9 / -6

You blame rape victims too?

4
iDinduNuffin 4 points ago +5 / -1

What does blame have to do with the fact that you need to defend yourself?

3
Kingoftheroad 3 points ago +4 / -1

"What a stupid question! But I know you, and you ask a lot of stupid questions"

When they hold any responsibility for the occurrence, or could have prevented it then yes o a certain degree even if its 1 percent and if they dont, then no. Stupid question. They are high level people now and need to be cautious. A few questions back...do crazy people exist? Is her husband notoriously famous as a Trump supporter? Do people who want Trump supporters dead at any cost exist? Do you think she will walk the dog without any protection after this? Its horrible, everybody should feel safe in their home but guess what sunshine, home invaders exist. Evil is out there and we have to protect ourselves and each other from it.

To say its victim blaming to suggest that someone should consider if there was anything they could have done differently is ridiculous and does nothing to help ourselves prevent future incidents. Have you never heard the expression thats it good to learn from your mistakes but better to learn from others? Or do you think we should just walk around like unaware toddlers our whole lives? Don't you think if there were Patriots there this would have been stopped? That thinking helps nobody improve their self preservation in a world with evil.

Why don't you put this to the test and put a big sign on your front lawn saying here's my wallet with all money, please dont take it? You wouldn't because you know someone will come along who doesn't have empathy or remorse and steal from you. So it LOCK it in your house with you where its safer. Feeling like perpetual victims comes from your way of thinking and its not how we do things around here. Thats for the leftist strategists that make money and gain power off people becoming and staying weak. Were about learning and growing, and protecting ourselves, each other, our rights and freedoms, and our country.

-1
Flptplt -1 points ago +1 / -2

Sometimes. Young girl gets drunk and hangs around a bunch of strange guys, she had it coming.

2
Fordheartskav 2 points ago +3 / -1

who? 70 year olds? don't be such a fucking retard

2
iDinduNuffin 2 points ago +3 / -1

https://www.learnaboutguns.com/2009/01/09/93-year-old-man-shoots-home-invader-in-self-defense/

But let me know when you turn 70 and suddenly stop needing your guns, I'll be more than happy to buy em off you.

0
Flptplt 0 points ago +1 / -1

Don't go wander around a questionable neighborhood, that's just common sense anyone should have. And shame on her family for letting her go do that.

0
Fordheartskav 0 points ago +1 / -1

her own neighbourhood ??? its a rich fucking neighbourhood. this is nobody's fault but the retard leftist. you've smoked too much weed

1
Heywood_youblowme 1 point ago +2 / -1

You're blaming the victim? A woman in her 70's who was ambushed from behind??

Gun would be of no use unless you're peeking around everywhere and treat everyone around as if they are gonna attack you.