53
posted ago by RemoteBus +55 / -2

I really hope he turns his back on the Republican Party, i believe 10 asshole cunt republicans voted to impeach him, so i say to trump, go third party.

And yes i know people will say it will split the vote and give the WH to the democrats, so?? hows that any different from a Rino such as Romney winning in the future.

i've also heard people say, in the past political parties havent worked. this will be different with Trump heading it, getting disinfranchisd people from both parties as well as independants to join up.

even better will be if Trump starts his own media company which i hope he does do. it would all fit together very nicely, a very big third party that both parties would have to take notice of and a media company that wasnt part of the five companies that run the media.

I really hope he turns his back on the Republican Party, i believe 10 asshole cunt republicans voted to impeach him, so i say to trump, go third party. And yes i know people will say it will split the vote and give the WH to the democrats, so?? hows that any different from a Rino such as Romney winning in the future. i've also heard people say, in the past political parties havent worked. this will be different with Trump heading it, getting disinfranchisd people from both parties as well as independants to join up. even better will be if Trump starts his own media company which i hope he does do. it would all fit together very nicely, a very big third party that both parties would have to take notice of and a media company that wasnt part of the five companies that run the media.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
5
Taylor3006 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah this is probably a better strategy. MAGA outnumbers the normal "republicans" easily and we can get rid of the RHINOs handily. When President Trump is sworn in for his second term in a few days, I wish he would begin a real purge of the party. Then come midterms, we can finish the work.

2
coconutnuts 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not a fan of this strategy but it's the most efficient way to be a dominating party is taking over the Republican party.

1
Taylor3006 1 point ago +1 / -0

Neither am I but the system is rigged in favor of the two major parties. As much as I would love to see a MAGA party, probably best if we just dominate and control one of the two.

4
alwaystrumper20 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't think its happened before in history with someone as popular as him, who knows what will happen.

I agree, what difference does It make if republicans never win again. The party nuked itself from within last week.

My only concern about his own media company is that it obviously wouldnt be at arms length, I mean how would he cover himself and his movement? I can easily see it being dismissed by some from both sides of political spectrum. - not saying I wouldnt support it

2
RemoteBus [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bloomberg ran for President, and i didnt see his news media outlet stop reporting on him.

1
alwaystrumper20 1 point ago +1 / -0

YES SIR, Completely forgot about this. Although he was already in media and then ran for president. My dad watches Bloomberg it makes me sick.

1
JEARS 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

He's so popular according to msm that he lost to a corrupt frail dementia patient. I don't see him having a future in politics. The RNC will kick him to the curb and in their delusion think they can win with a Rubio or Haley. He better have a fn good reason for letting massive voter fraud and election interference both domestic and foreign stand or many others will not be supporting him as well. He has 5 days to show something and idgaf about the Durham report.

1
alwaystrumper20 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wouldn’t say he’s let it happen, it seems he has tried every legal and constitutional route there was. His team has exposed the evidence to no victory due to the media black out and the “baseless claims of fraud” people believe 9/11 was a conspiracy on far less evidence than there is of the voter fraud.

What about the executive order Flynn speaks about in the Alex Jones interview ??

1
JEARS 1 point ago +1 / -0

A team of military and non military cyber security experts have been working on foreign election interference since the summer , they have the goods. It is Trumps Constitutional duty to protect the country from foreign election interference. Colonel Waldron says the irrefutable proof of the foreign interference will come to light no matter what Trump does, and the Constitutional experts really don't know what to do when the election is proven false. But it has to be investigated as a matter of national security.

Trump was urged by Flynn and Powell to seize the voting machines, ballots and election materials in the 8 counties where the irregularities happened and have the national guard do a manual count of the ballots on a live stream. This would prove one way or another what happened. So why didn't he do it? There was nothing to lose imho. I really fn hope it isn't some bs like " we have to move on for the good of the country " and too many people are involved and exposing them will erode the public's confidence in the government. Bullshit. Remember Sydney saying let it rip and let the chips fall where they will? Well I think someone is afraid where those chips fall.

1
alwaystrumper20 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats my biggest wonder, what happens when this is eventually proven false.

I think he didn't do that specifically at the time because he was surrounded by swamp creature lawyers giving him terrible advice Vs Flynn and Powell.

1
JEARS 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

Well Professor Eastman and other respected Constitutional scholars don't know, it would be unchartered territory. I suspect they would let the election stand " for the good of the country". I mean can you imagine overturning the election in say March? I just don't see it. And of course there is no doubt very prominent people were behind the theft, what becomes of that? Classified for the good of the country? Lol I'm too vested , I watched every hearing and explored every experts work and analysis. We voted , we hounded legislatures and we watched hearings so we could fill the gaps to inform others. We deserve an answer. What did Ashli die for?

1
alwaystrumper20 1 point ago +1 / -0

ive been following this like a hawk, its my life atm.

1
JEARS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol, me too, studying it like its my job. I unregistered to vote last week. Our Secretary of State sent the entire state voter roll to Pakistan. Great now somewhere in Pakistan, someone has my name, address, dob, ssn and party affiliation. That was the last straw for me.

I hope we get an answer, I'm so fearful we won't get anything resembling a satisfactory explanation.

2
momspaghetti 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's the point in swapping parties if he can't hold a third term?

2
Ironlabel1 2 points ago +2 / -0

It won’t matter when votes are fucked with

2
VictorLaszlo20 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope we don't have parties at all.

2
ANTI_Globalist12 2 points ago +2 / -0

No need for a new party, we will clean up the gop

2
RemoteBus [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

yeah right, because its so clean now isnt it. he has been president the past four years, andthe party is corrupt now as its ever been.

1
wethepepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree but also he might not need to

Someone said most of the Republicans are back up for election in 2022 or something

Assuming free and fair elections (llolllll).

Then he could go through and basically pick who he wants to replace the backstabbers

Then run again in 2024 and win. Provided free and fair election (super mega lollllll)

All things are possible as long as everyone gets one vote and one vote counts as one vote

1
JEARS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well of course the entire House runs every two years and one third of the Senate ....so 212 House Republicans and perhaps 20+ Senate Republicans ( I think 2022 is a light year for Senate Republicans )

1
alwaystrumper20 1 point ago +1 / -0

"All things are possible as long as everyone gets one vote and one vote counts as one vote"

I just can't look past us not rectifying it this time and acting like it won't be a problem next time.

1
Russianfist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Love the hopium, it would be some nice fresh air. He said a new administration so why not creating it the 21st? Is it possible?

1
Amanda 1 point ago +2 / -1

I guess we will find out very soon, but the game is still afoot!

1
TRUMP420KUSH 1 point ago +1 / -0

He will lead the building of a new party. With the use of his coming media platform/empire he can give a voice to the people MSM would drown out for the RINOs