219
Comments (27)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-4
Lapstrake -4 points ago +4 / -8

Ashli Babbitt is not a real person. She is a character played by a crisis actor. A psyop designed to make us angry so that we seem more like the narrative.

No planes hit any buildings on 911. Mossad group Gelitin/B-Thing/E-Team used explosives to make plane-shaped holes in the buildings. The reason for the fakeness is because a real plane crashing into the building would very like fuck up all the planted charges. The buildings had to fall neatly into their foundations in order to hide the evidence of demolition. All the worldwide news media was in on it.

You may commence attacking me now.

10
60Recce [S] 10 points ago +11 / -1

No one is going to attack you for being a skeptic of anything here.

That's what this place is for friend.

2
Lapstrake 2 points ago +3 / -1

I've already been heavily attacked for both those viewpoints.

It's ok. I'm used to it. I don't care. I don't think they will attack me here given your content.

6
60Recce [S] 6 points ago +7 / -1

My content ? Oh my, I try to make my fellow pedes think about things and hopefully laugh at the same time.

Put yer helmet on...

4
Ophelia 4 points ago +4 / -0

People saw the planes hit bro

1
Lapstrake 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://files.catbox.moe/bsvmvo.mp4

No plane. Just explosion. The plane would have covered up the explosion. I.E. the light from the explosion that we see could not have traveled through a huge aluminum airliner.

There is no plane.

https://files.catbox.moe/i27rl3.jpg

No Plane.

3
Flightgirl1 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Pentagon absolutely wasn't hit by a plane. Whatever the truth, the official narrative is a total lie to get us into war and take away our civil liberties.

1
Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are literally pictures out there of charred bodies still in their seats inside the Pentagon. And debris all over the outside from what was obviously an American Airlines jet. You can even see the lettering on some of the telltale chrome-colored hull pieces

2
Vox_Dobad 2 points ago +2 / -0

Funny that you post this on a post with the message "don't let anyone tell you that what you see with your eyes isn't happening."

I can't speak to Ashli Babbit, but there are literally dozens of videos of the planes hitting the WTC, most (but not all) of which were the second hit. Many of these were taken by amateurs. I've probably seen all of them. And there were thousands of eyewitnesses.

The Towers were designed specifically to fall into their own footprint if they ever came down for whatever reason. Burning jet fuel and debris was sufficient heat to weaken the steel structure to the point of collapse with all the weight of the upper floors on top of the weakened structure.

That's why the second tower hit was the first to collapse: that plane hit several floors lower than the first one.

To be clear, that doesn't preclude your theory of Mossad being behind the attack, or that black hats within our own government were involved. Could very well have been an inside job.

But jetliners most definitely took down the Twin Towers.

2
Lapstrake 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is kinda creepy how entities like you pop out of the woodwork on a forum that has nothing to do with 911, and a post that has nothing to do with 911. I always get pushback if I say that no planes hit any buildings on 911.

The fact is that no planes hit the towers. If you think this super important to argue about, then go ahead.

https://files.catbox.moe/bsvmvo.mp4

1
Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Entities" like me? Lol I'm just a solo pede, dude.

You brought up 9/11, not me.

I dunno if the guy's channel is still around, as it was years ago when I watched his vids, but check out RKOwens4 on youtube. Pretty damn definitive evidence of the WTC, Pentagon, and Shanksville all being airliners.

And while I'm pretty sure I've probably already seen whatever theory is on your link, I'll check it out.

2
Lapstrake 2 points ago +2 / -0

You came out of the woodwork, dude. OP's post was about how gaslighting was used to silence the truth.

I mentioned two things that I believe to be true, knowing that it always leads to entities popping out of the woodwork to push back. And I was 100% correct.

Immediately at 6am in the morning there are people gaslighting with no evidence. YOU ARE WRONG. THAT IS DUMB.

Sorry not sorry.

I hope someday soon somebody shuts this down because it is annoying.

But attacking me isn't going to stop what is coming. I think Trump is hella pissed off at what you guys did.

2
Flightgirl1 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. U of Alaska did the most extensive study on 9/11, in particular Building 7. They found the official narrative is complete bs and 7 was not brought down by fire. http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7

Thousands of architects and engineers for truth have signed off on the large study which completely refutes the gov narrative. https://www.ae911truth.org/

A panel of NY Commissioners are demanding real investigations. They have said the buildings were brought down with preplanted explosives. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/07/no_author/new-york-fire-commissioners-call-for-new-9-11-investigation-about-pre-planted-explosives/

Many, many people are still fighting for the truth and demanding answers. The media largely ignores them. Trump needs to release all the documents on 9/11 unredacted. We demand the truth.

1
Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the buildings were brought down by explosives, why not just say terrorists planted bombs?

Why create a giant conspiracy which would have had to include thousands and thousands of people, including those that "died" on the airplanes, their entire families, Air Traffic Controllers, first responders, and many others, as well as dozens who videoed the events, and a metric shit-ton of eyewitnesses?

Fire in the lower floors brought down WTC7. It's been awhile since I've dived into this rabbit hole, but as I recall, it had a big diesel tank in the basement to run generators.

None of the videos leading up to its (or WTC 1 and 2) collapse captured explosives being detonated. Explosions are extremely loud. Multiply that by dozens for a controlled demo.

1
Flightgirl1 1 point ago +1 / -0

There were planes and the buildings were lined with explosives.

2
hmmmms 2 points ago +2 / -0

hired an actress and set up an entire fake life just to do something they could have done with any rally attendee since Trump supporters were there

Vs

the deep state simply posts lies online, uses right wing paranoia to strengthen right wing infighting which doubles as getting the right to shit on the only people with the balls to protest against the deep state

Yeah the second one seems more realistic to me. It’s weird though how the Alex Jones types that claim we live in commie dictatorships where they will rape our kids, also don’t believe people would be so mad to break a window about them stealing an election??

2
Lapstrake 2 points ago +2 / -0

hired an actress and set up an entire fake life

They did a shitty job of 'entire fake life'.

prove me wrong. Show me her entire life.