219
Comments (27)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
Vox_Dobad 2 points ago +2 / -0

Funny that you post this on a post with the message "don't let anyone tell you that what you see with your eyes isn't happening."

I can't speak to Ashli Babbit, but there are literally dozens of videos of the planes hitting the WTC, most (but not all) of which were the second hit. Many of these were taken by amateurs. I've probably seen all of them. And there were thousands of eyewitnesses.

The Towers were designed specifically to fall into their own footprint if they ever came down for whatever reason. Burning jet fuel and debris was sufficient heat to weaken the steel structure to the point of collapse with all the weight of the upper floors on top of the weakened structure.

That's why the second tower hit was the first to collapse: that plane hit several floors lower than the first one.

To be clear, that doesn't preclude your theory of Mossad being behind the attack, or that black hats within our own government were involved. Could very well have been an inside job.

But jetliners most definitely took down the Twin Towers.

2
Lapstrake 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is kinda creepy how entities like you pop out of the woodwork on a forum that has nothing to do with 911, and a post that has nothing to do with 911. I always get pushback if I say that no planes hit any buildings on 911.

The fact is that no planes hit the towers. If you think this super important to argue about, then go ahead.

https://files.catbox.moe/bsvmvo.mp4

1
Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Entities" like me? Lol I'm just a solo pede, dude.

You brought up 9/11, not me.

I dunno if the guy's channel is still around, as it was years ago when I watched his vids, but check out RKOwens4 on youtube. Pretty damn definitive evidence of the WTC, Pentagon, and Shanksville all being airliners.

And while I'm pretty sure I've probably already seen whatever theory is on your link, I'll check it out.

2
Lapstrake 2 points ago +2 / -0

You came out of the woodwork, dude. OP's post was about how gaslighting was used to silence the truth.

I mentioned two things that I believe to be true, knowing that it always leads to entities popping out of the woodwork to push back. And I was 100% correct.

Immediately at 6am in the morning there are people gaslighting with no evidence. YOU ARE WRONG. THAT IS DUMB.

Sorry not sorry.

I hope someday soon somebody shuts this down because it is annoying.

But attacking me isn't going to stop what is coming. I think Trump is hella pissed off at what you guys did.

1
Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +1 / -0

I work graveyard, dude. It's now only 4:00 where I live.

I saw your comment on a post I found interesting, and responded. End of story.

2
Flightgirl1 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. U of Alaska did the most extensive study on 9/11, in particular Building 7. They found the official narrative is complete bs and 7 was not brought down by fire. http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7

Thousands of architects and engineers for truth have signed off on the large study which completely refutes the gov narrative. https://www.ae911truth.org/

A panel of NY Commissioners are demanding real investigations. They have said the buildings were brought down with preplanted explosives. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/07/no_author/new-york-fire-commissioners-call-for-new-9-11-investigation-about-pre-planted-explosives/

Many, many people are still fighting for the truth and demanding answers. The media largely ignores them. Trump needs to release all the documents on 9/11 unredacted. We demand the truth.

1
Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the buildings were brought down by explosives, why not just say terrorists planted bombs?

Why create a giant conspiracy which would have had to include thousands and thousands of people, including those that "died" on the airplanes, their entire families, Air Traffic Controllers, first responders, and many others, as well as dozens who videoed the events, and a metric shit-ton of eyewitnesses?

Fire in the lower floors brought down WTC7. It's been awhile since I've dived into this rabbit hole, but as I recall, it had a big diesel tank in the basement to run generators.

None of the videos leading up to its (or WTC 1 and 2) collapse captured explosives being detonated. Explosions are extremely loud. Multiply that by dozens for a controlled demo.

1
Flightgirl1 1 point ago +1 / -0

There were planes and the buildings were lined with explosives.

1
Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where? There were zero explosions aside from when the planes hit. Like I said, they're friggin loud. And I've probably watched every single video out there of the entire morning, from the first plane til the collapse of 7.

The only thing I've heard that people misidentified as explosions were as the buildings were already coming down. People heard the floors pancaking against each other.