No. U of Alaska did the most extensive study on 9/11, in particular Building 7. They found the official narrative is complete bs and 7 was not brought down by fire.
http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
Thousands of architects and engineers for truth have signed off on the large study which completely refutes the gov narrative.
https://www.ae911truth.org/
Many, many people are still fighting for the truth and demanding answers. The media largely ignores them. Trump needs to release all the documents on 9/11 unredacted. We demand the truth.
If the buildings were brought down by explosives, why not just say terrorists planted bombs?
Why create a giant conspiracy which would have had to include thousands and thousands of people, including those that "died" on the airplanes, their entire families, Air Traffic Controllers, first responders, and many others, as well as dozens who videoed the events, and a metric shit-ton of eyewitnesses?
Fire in the lower floors brought down WTC7. It's been awhile since I've dived into this rabbit hole, but as I recall, it had a big diesel tank in the basement to run generators.
None of the videos leading up to its (or WTC 1 and 2) collapse captured explosives being detonated. Explosions are extremely loud. Multiply that by dozens for a controlled demo.
Where? There were zero explosions aside from when the planes hit. Like I said, they're friggin loud. And I've probably watched every single video out there of the entire morning, from the first plane til the collapse of 7.
The only thing I've heard that people misidentified as explosions were as the buildings were already coming down. People heard the floors pancaking against each other.
No. U of Alaska did the most extensive study on 9/11, in particular Building 7. They found the official narrative is complete bs and 7 was not brought down by fire. http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
Thousands of architects and engineers for truth have signed off on the large study which completely refutes the gov narrative. https://www.ae911truth.org/
A panel of NY Commissioners are demanding real investigations. They have said the buildings were brought down with preplanted explosives. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/07/no_author/new-york-fire-commissioners-call-for-new-9-11-investigation-about-pre-planted-explosives/
Many, many people are still fighting for the truth and demanding answers. The media largely ignores them. Trump needs to release all the documents on 9/11 unredacted. We demand the truth.
If the buildings were brought down by explosives, why not just say terrorists planted bombs?
Why create a giant conspiracy which would have had to include thousands and thousands of people, including those that "died" on the airplanes, their entire families, Air Traffic Controllers, first responders, and many others, as well as dozens who videoed the events, and a metric shit-ton of eyewitnesses?
Fire in the lower floors brought down WTC7. It's been awhile since I've dived into this rabbit hole, but as I recall, it had a big diesel tank in the basement to run generators.
None of the videos leading up to its (or WTC 1 and 2) collapse captured explosives being detonated. Explosions are extremely loud. Multiply that by dozens for a controlled demo.
There were planes and the buildings were lined with explosives.
Where? There were zero explosions aside from when the planes hit. Like I said, they're friggin loud. And I've probably watched every single video out there of the entire morning, from the first plane til the collapse of 7.
The only thing I've heard that people misidentified as explosions were as the buildings were already coming down. People heard the floors pancaking against each other.