None examined the evidence.
Most dismissed on a technical basis, mostly lack of standing.
The few that actually pretended to read the full filings demanded 100% undisputed proof where the legal standard for a full hearing is probable cause, in violation of their duty.
Some, like the PA Supreme Court, agreed with the Trump campaign that the state did violate its constitution with its election procedures, but it was too late to remedy and then the U.S. Supreme court refused to hear it.
And let us forget that despite compelling evidence of fraud, not a single state agreed to a full audit of their election, something they should have done. That is one of the things the left was doing since 2016 - using subtle fraud to get complicit sociopaths in power (Gov, AG, SoS) in these swing states to facilitate the large scale fraud they were planning in 2020. That they fought tooth and nail against any sort of audit or signature matching made it that much harder for the campaign to make its case to a court.
One thing I don't understand is - didn't Alito order PA to separate the ballots that came in late from the legal ones, and that order wasn't followed? How is it possible that a state can so fragrantly ignore an order from the Supreme Court, and nothing will come of it? Are there aspects of that case that I am missing? Is it still ongoing?
They wiped their ass with his order. Alito did vote to hear the Texas Case along with Clarence Thomas. Apparently the screws have been put to the other justices.
I thought they did separate the ballots but in the end, the number of ballots that were separated was not enough to make a statistical difference? PA is definitely the state where the courts had legitimate cases before the election even started. Unfortunately, even with PA we wouldn't have won...
The PA case was a complete "Heads I win, tails you lose." Under PA law, you don't have standing to challenge any changes to electoral law unless you can demonstrate you were harmed by the change - hence no challenges before the election. Then they threw out the case on the legal principle of "laches" which basically means you waited to long to file suit.
Can't challenge before the election, can't challenge after.
Is there an easy way to view these sources? I've been asked by family members why the courts didn't do anything, and all I could say was that they dismissed without looking at the evidence - to normies, that sounds nigh unbelievable.
It would take a lot of guts for a judge to do something... easier to dismiss on procedural grounds having nothing to do with the merits.
Speaking of guts; I figure the point of the DC rally was to let Pence know he'd be safe (from leftist protestors) and supported if he refused to count electors from states with election irregularities. The constitution has a way to handle that (contingent election in the house) but he played the same card. Acted like he didn't have authority to do what he clearly could... another buck pass.
From Australia, actually watched the steal take place while y'all were sleeping.
it was traumatic. I basically refreshed the computer and Wisconsin was flipped. Went to bed and then Michigan flipped by morning.
I had an uneasy feeling as the polls "closed" and the counting stopped, I just knew it was going to happen.
On what planet did we think the swamp and the media were going to let us win in a landslide and repudiate all their frauds from the past 4 years making fools of them.
I was watching the GA primary results and saw the same thing. Perdue up 120,000 and on the next refresh less than 30 s later it was less than 20,000. Also the predicted percent counted went from 99 to 93.
That doesn't prove them to be wrong. It proves the courts were corrupt. The Texas case was never heard by any court. If it had, it would have easily won and that is exactly why SCOTUS refused it on the most ridiculous grounds.
They told us months in advance. "Brace yourselves as Trump supporters react to seeing Trump being in the lead all day during the 3rd only for Biden to win once all mail in voting was counted."
Yup. Fox News called AZ for Biden with like 1% reporting (lol), yet they refused to call GA or any other swing state for Trump even though he had big leads with 95-99% reporting.
Biggest fuck you to the American people in the history of this country.
But I thought Trump supporters watched Fox and Biden supporters watched CNN/NBC? So what difference would it make if each of them had their own agenda? I mean, lets say I am going to buy a Ford. On the way there, you keep trying to convince me to buy a Ford. I've already made up my mind to buy a Ford. So?
What are you talking about? Lmao I’d bet the majority of the people here haven’t watched Fox once since Nov 3. I know I haven’t - not that I really did before anyway.
Trump supporters rarely even watched Fox News before the election and they certainly don't watch it now.
Stop with the bullshit narrative that we get our marchingn orders from Fox. We aren't the left, we aren't the people who let CNN and Twitter blue checkmark decide the narrative for us just so we don't have to think.
Fox coverage was pro Trump? On which planet do you live? Maybe a 4-5 people were left who didn't trash Trump on air.... For example, their coverage of the debates included in studio people like: Donna Brazill, Karl Rove. Chris Wallace and Dana Parino.
I don't watch, just election coverage on my rabbit ears. They would take hours...I mean days to call a state for Trump, you could tell they were holding out for the fake ballots to appear.
There is a ton of evidence. The problem is nobody heard it. And then corrupt politicians were too cowardice to stand up the establishment and vote for it to be investigated.
Well, if it helps I can confirm that this happened because I watched it happen on the night of the election.
I think the deboonkers claimed that this was a data entry error - that some district had missed a digit, so a whole lot of votes got added when they fixed the error. However from what we now know of the process, the data entry is all done by machines - the data is just transferred using USB sticks and over the Internet.
In addition I think this was the district where witnesses reported a truck coming in, which everyone initially thought was delivering food, but which instead contained thousands upon thousands of ballots in boxes and duffel bags. But don't quote me on either of those things, because there were a lot of shenanigans in a lot of different places.
Everyones' data matched that morning. I'm not sure of the raw source of ops screenshot, but I know there were multiple posts from multiple feeds that matched that morning.
Look through posts on T_D or /pol from the night of the third/morning of the fourth.
There is a fun video floating around of CNN Cuomo losing his shit when Wisconsin flipped from a 100k or so Trump lead to Biden up with one big vote dump in the early morning if you're absolutely determined to have a primary source in real time.
Some pede also downloaded and posted all of the MSM livestreams before they all got deleted if you really want to dig. They should be posted on here somewhere around the fifth.
On Jan 6, I was struck by the number of Senators who stated "every election has fraud." Really? Wow, news to me -the voter. They seemed quite at ease with it, normalizing it.
Make them pay. It requires 0 violence to leave their platforms, boycott their companies, and their advertising supporters. Without your money, all of them and China will fail.
You'll never need to ask why they were shredded to bits and discarded in the steet like trash. They already showed you why, and will conitinue to show you until the unavoidable end.
The many statistical anomalies were never explained by the Left. They usually make up some bullshit to feed the public but this time not a single word was spoken about it. Their silence about this is what really resonated with me.
Does anyone have this with timestamps and source? I've looked but can't find it with zero for all the other candidates. I'm engaged in a debate and my MSM believing opposition has said it would convince him media is fake and Biden cheated if I can find the receipts.
No, Trump stole the presidency, by proving democracy still mattered to the rigged voting system. He wasn't supposed to win in the first place, and no one like him ever will again while we have these assholes making decisions.
I mean you're telling me I should trust Illinois with zero standards as to who can vote and even has email delivered ballots which are "remade" on real ballot paper? Also IL is +1R but votes further left than California. IDK, call me a crazy conspiracy theorist but something don't smell right. HONK HONK HONK
That’s their goal: they want to create the appearance that anyone that claims the election was a fraud is a persona non grata. The way we counter that is to normalize calling it a fraud. It should be called a fraud on the web and IRL non stop.
I'll never forget, but just wait 10 years, everything's that true will be twisted by the media in 9/11 truther style, and anyone that talks about it will be labeled crazy
Is there any possible explanation for this? Like, anything at all? Because that is the equivalent of about 7 hockey stadiums with a butt in every seat and 100% of them voting for Biden.
Because these judges want to peacefully make their salaries and not have the left firebomb their homes or be suicided. Even the SCOTUS betrayed Trump. They spent time making decisions on some very trivial things, like some mayor of a puerto rican town, instead of examining one of the biggest frauds in US history.
This fraud was too obvious
I knew it you knew it everybody knew it, we said the same in my family room.
As soon as they stopped counting, that was it. The media also knew it was it, and started its operation to gaslight the entire country.
And this insurrection crap is to push it out of the news while accusing dissenters of being traitors.
None examined the evidence. Most dismissed on a technical basis, mostly lack of standing. The few that actually pretended to read the full filings demanded 100% undisputed proof where the legal standard for a full hearing is probable cause, in violation of their duty.
Some, like the PA Supreme Court, agreed with the Trump campaign that the state did violate its constitution with its election procedures, but it was too late to remedy and then the U.S. Supreme court refused to hear it.
And let us forget that despite compelling evidence of fraud, not a single state agreed to a full audit of their election, something they should have done. That is one of the things the left was doing since 2016 - using subtle fraud to get complicit sociopaths in power (Gov, AG, SoS) in these swing states to facilitate the large scale fraud they were planning in 2020. That they fought tooth and nail against any sort of audit or signature matching made it that much harder for the campaign to make its case to a court.
One thing I don't understand is - didn't Alito order PA to separate the ballots that came in late from the legal ones, and that order wasn't followed? How is it possible that a state can so fragrantly ignore an order from the Supreme Court, and nothing will come of it? Are there aspects of that case that I am missing? Is it still ongoing?
They wiped their ass with his order. Alito did vote to hear the Texas Case along with Clarence Thomas. Apparently the screws have been put to the other justices.
Well they are crooks. That doesn't work with their plan.
I thought they did separate the ballots but in the end, the number of ballots that were separated was not enough to make a statistical difference? PA is definitely the state where the courts had legitimate cases before the election even started. Unfortunately, even with PA we wouldn't have won...
I think the thing is - we didnt just win PA, we also won GA, MI, AZ, NV, WI
PA has now destroyed the evidence making it impossible to verify the results
But they must be held responsible for sending in false electors. We have a problem that cannot be ignored.
The PA case was a complete "Heads I win, tails you lose." Under PA law, you don't have standing to challenge any changes to electoral law unless you can demonstrate you were harmed by the change - hence no challenges before the election. Then they threw out the case on the legal principle of "laches" which basically means you waited to long to file suit.
Can't challenge before the election, can't challenge after.
Is there an easy way to view these sources? I've been asked by family members why the courts didn't do anything, and all I could say was that they dismissed without looking at the evidence - to normies, that sounds nigh unbelievable.
It would take a lot of guts for a judge to do something... easier to dismiss on procedural grounds having nothing to do with the merits. Speaking of guts; I figure the point of the DC rally was to let Pence know he'd be safe (from leftist protestors) and supported if he refused to count electors from states with election irregularities. The constitution has a way to handle that (contingent election in the house) but he played the same card. Acted like he didn't have authority to do what he clearly could... another buck pass.
It's always nice to have refreshed that most all politicians (and judges, it appears) are cowards.
Bring in the military tribunals!
Theyre all cowards.
No one wants to have their home burnt down by antifa and their personal lives exposed by Democrat media for "stealing the election for trump".
Youd need a BIBLICAL amount of courage to volunteer to be a target of the lefts character assasination machine.
Like Trump did.
All Corrupt
Oh, you sweet summer child...
Name a single case where the court allowed examination of the evidence?
From Australia, actually watched the steal take place while y'all were sleeping.
it was traumatic. I basically refreshed the computer and Wisconsin was flipped. Went to bed and then Michigan flipped by morning.
I had an uneasy feeling as the polls "closed" and the counting stopped, I just knew it was going to happen.
On what planet did we think the swamp and the media were going to let us win in a landslide and repudiate all their frauds from the past 4 years making fools of them.
I was watching the GA primary results and saw the same thing. Perdue up 120,000 and on the next refresh less than 30 s later it was less than 20,000. Also the predicted percent counted went from 99 to 93.
THEY STOLE THE FUCKING ELECTION. It makes me fucking frustrated as hell that they might get away with it, I pray for something be done.
MILITARY TRIBUNALS.
You think the military will step in to prosecute? There isn't a jail big enough to put everyone involved
Peter Navarro's reports https://navarroreport.com
The Texas lawsuit pdf that lays out the facts and evidence brilliantly. https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/admin/2020/Press/SCOTUSFiling.pdf
That doesn't prove them to be wrong. It proves the courts were corrupt. The Texas case was never heard by any court. If it had, it would have easily won and that is exactly why SCOTUS refused it on the most ridiculous grounds.
Why are you lying?
https://www.bravecanary.com/#e2020
They should sticky this until the entire situation is resolved. Right now, no other information is more important than the election fraud evidence.
You could tell it was rigged from the start just by the media coverage alone.
They told us months in advance. "Brace yourselves as Trump supporters react to seeing Trump being in the lead all day during the 3rd only for Biden to win once all mail in voting was counted."
Yup. Fox News called AZ for Biden with like 1% reporting (lol), yet they refused to call GA or any other swing state for Trump even though he had big leads with 95-99% reporting.
Biggest fuck you to the American people in the history of this country.
But I thought Trump supporters watched Fox and Biden supporters watched CNN/NBC? So what difference would it make if each of them had their own agenda? I mean, lets say I am going to buy a Ford. On the way there, you keep trying to convince me to buy a Ford. I've already made up my mind to buy a Ford. So?
What are you talking about? Lmao I’d bet the majority of the people here haven’t watched Fox once since Nov 3. I know I haven’t - not that I really did before anyway.
Trump supporters rarely even watched Fox News before the election and they certainly don't watch it now.
Stop with the bullshit narrative that we get our marchingn orders from Fox. We aren't the left, we aren't the people who let CNN and Twitter blue checkmark decide the narrative for us just so we don't have to think.
Fox coverage was pro Trump? On which planet do you live? Maybe a 4-5 people were left who didn't trash Trump on air.... For example, their coverage of the debates included in studio people like: Donna Brazill, Karl Rove. Chris Wallace and Dana Parino.
I don't watch, just election coverage on my rabbit ears. They would take hours...I mean days to call a state for Trump, you could tell they were holding out for the fake ballots to appear.
Anyone who doesn’t believe there was fraud is either willfully ignorant or ok with a fraudulent election.
There is a ton of evidence. The problem is nobody heard it. And then corrupt politicians were too cowardice to stand up the establishment and vote for it to be investigated.
You can't steal something you don't have.
Joe Biden is not President.
Joe Biden has a coup.
So blatantly fake, 138k votes for one cantidate and not even one accidental vote for a 3rd party candidate?!
"BOOM, These explosions of bullshit" -PDJT
Oh look, shiney new account with no post and every comment is a "fact check" from Reuters or Politifact. Can I speak to your manager at the FBI?
That’s graphic needs more info. Time.
~6am 11/4
What source?
My memory 06:00 +/- 1 hr was that big dump
Source, not time. Whose data is shown in pic?
Looks like New York Times to me. All of them got their data from the same source though (via Scytl).
So, I can't share because it's just some graphic from online.
Well, if it helps I can confirm that this happened because I watched it happen on the night of the election.
I think the deboonkers claimed that this was a data entry error - that some district had missed a digit, so a whole lot of votes got added when they fixed the error. However from what we now know of the process, the data entry is all done by machines - the data is just transferred using USB sticks and over the Internet.
In addition I think this was the district where witnesses reported a truck coming in, which everyone initially thought was delivering food, but which instead contained thousands upon thousands of ballots in boxes and duffel bags. But don't quote me on either of those things, because there were a lot of shenanigans in a lot of different places.
Everyones' data matched that morning. I'm not sure of the raw source of ops screenshot, but I know there were multiple posts from multiple feeds that matched that morning.
https://kekpe.pe/i/6001a2e25225f.jpg
One I grabbed that I can confirm the source as 538
Thanks, bit this is still not something I can't share with any confidence it was 'reported' or live.
Look through posts on T_D or /pol from the night of the third/morning of the fourth.
There is a fun video floating around of CNN Cuomo losing his shit when Wisconsin flipped from a 100k or so Trump lead to Biden up with one big vote dump in the early morning if you're absolutely determined to have a primary source in real time.
Some pede also downloaded and posted all of the MSM livestreams before they all got deleted if you really want to dig. They should be posted on here somewhere around the fifth.
Not to mention they stole the senate too. John James in Michigan should have won
On Jan 6, I was struck by the number of Senators who stated "every election has fraud." Really? Wow, news to me -the voter. They seemed quite at ease with it, normalizing it.
Make them pay. It requires 0 violence to leave their platforms, boycott their companies, and their advertising supporters. Without your money, all of them and China will fail.
You can ruin their lives far more than that
shhhh! ix-nay on the ore-may! ...that's for after.
We should regularly remind ourselves us this during the entire FICUS reign. FICUS = Fraud-In-Chief of the United States.
You'll never need to ask why they were shredded to bits and discarded in the steet like trash. They already showed you why, and will conitinue to show you until the unavoidable end.
1/6 was a false flag to divert attention away from the fraud
We saw this happen in real time. Don't forget these CNN videos. They have never been explained.
https://streamable.com/31zhlj
I will never call Biden a president
He may be president but I'll always qualify it as "unelected president, Joe Biden".
He's not the president. It's a coup.
And not a goddamn thing is done about it. Your republic as it was and as it shouldve been is no longer. I morn for you and the citizens of the world.
Your rights will be slowly taken away. And humankind will become a race of slave owners once again.
The many statistical anomalies were never explained by the Left. They usually make up some bullshit to feed the public but this time not a single word was spoken about it. Their silence about this is what really resonated with me.
Liberals will tell you that you are wrong and all the big democratic cities were not counted yet...
Ok, so how can this have happened in the middle of the night hours after they all “stopped counting”?
How is this possible with the vertical spikes of votes without any movement for Trump, only Biden votes?
Also, statistically impossible.
Gaslighting isn't real. You sound like a crazy person.
^this is the most underrated comment here.
bravo brother
The steal was so clumsy and obvious it cannot withstand even a passing critical analysis.
The fact that 2020 US presidential election was so blatantly stolen makes me sick.
Trump won... BY A LOT!
Does anyone have this with timestamps and source? I've looked but can't find it with zero for all the other candidates. I'm engaged in a debate and my MSM believing opposition has said it would convince him media is fake and Biden cheated if I can find the receipts.
No, Trump stole the presidency, by proving democracy still mattered to the rigged voting system. He wasn't supposed to win in the first place, and no one like him ever will again while we have these assholes making decisions.
I don't even trust the results in non contested states.
Good. You shouldn't.
I mean you're telling me I should trust Illinois with zero standards as to who can vote and even has email delivered ballots which are "remade" on real ballot paper? Also IL is +1R but votes further left than California. IDK, call me a crazy conspiracy theorist but something don't smell right. HONK HONK HONK
You're using the word conspiracy properly so I'll call you sane.
They stole the election, but they haven't yet stole the Presidency.
Can someone give me a source on this beyond just a screenshot because I'm halfway to redpilling several of my friends. Where are these data from??
Stolen through and through
Wasn’t this one the “typo”, and it es supposed to be ~13,000
That still wouldn’t explain a 100% vote jump.
No, that was in New England area.
What are we looking at here?
Stole the House and Senate too.
That’s their goal: they want to create the appearance that anyone that claims the election was a fraud is a persona non grata. The way we counter that is to normalize calling it a fraud. It should be called a fraud on the web and IRL non stop.
Our new Communist overlords assure us it was the most secure election in American history. 🙄
high on hopium - this as false is a lie
I'll never forget, but just wait 10 years, everything's that true will be twisted by the media in 9/11 truther style, and anyone that talks about it will be labeled crazy
I hate Michigan and I live there fuck'n crooks
Is there any possible explanation for this? Like, anything at all? Because that is the equivalent of about 7 hockey stadiums with a butt in every seat and 100% of them voting for Biden.
Yup
Because these judges want to peacefully make their salaries and not have the left firebomb their homes or be suicided. Even the SCOTUS betrayed Trump. They spent time making decisions on some very trivial things, like some mayor of a puerto rican town, instead of examining one of the biggest frauds in US history.
How is this not the smoking gun?
Never been explained other than by deflecting to the Michigan country where they brush it off as human error.
The Edison Data either shows these anomalies or not.
WTF?
What do you guys think about this article? https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact-check-biden-vote-spikes-mi-wi/fact-check-biden-vote-spikes-and-county-recount-do-not-prove-democrats-are-trying-to-steal-the-election-in-michigan-and-wisconsin-idUSKBN27L2RL
Of course It was obvious.
Is this screen cap legit? I know they stole.
Genuine question when it comes to explaining the steal to normies - can't this be explained by inorderly upload of the data?
They stole nothing. We have a week left they are desperate.