7430
Yes, Mike. You are correct. (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by 10gauge ago by 10gauge +7430 / -0
Comments (251)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-7
Darth_Venath -7 points ago +6 / -13

Not dissing on Trump, but I’m not entirely convinced Trump “called for peace” for any reason other than to cover his backside.

There’s what he said at the DC rally, and then there’s the “we will not be silenced” tweet which got him censored.

I don’t jump because Trump tells me to, and I don’t stay seated because he tells me not to jump.

I’m looking at things objectively and thinking that I can either be a one man revolution or join the dark side.

I mean, we’ve seen what happens to people who prefer to die on their feet than live on their knees...is that where we are headed or is that where we’re at?

17
Lionkitty 17 points ago +18 / -1

No way anyone who supports TRUMP could think he was signaling anything other then for people to protest peacefully!!! TRUMP better then anyone of us knows what the FBI is capable of doing. No way TRUMP would encourage people to break laws, when he knows how easily doing so would be used to destroy their lives.

6
Darth_Venath 6 points ago +6 / -0

And you’re correct.

Nobody who supports Trump thought he was calling for anything other than lawful peaceful protesting.

But he left enough ambiguity in his statements for the left to criticize him on and to claim the exact opposite.

People on the left don’t speak the same language the people on the right do.

You make one statement, and both groups of people are going to get two different interpretations.

And remember, this is the same group of people who said all last year that it wasn’t good enough to “not be racist”. You have to “fight against racism” in order to not be a racist in their eyes. 🙄

This is also the same group of people that believes their violence and rioting is justified because of whatever reasons.....

1
peltast 1 point ago +1 / -0

But he left enough ambiguity in his statements for the left to criticize him on and to claim the exact opposite.

  1. By definition, ANY ambiguity would not allow ANYBODY except either a liar or an idiot, to claim the exact opposite. That's why it is 'ambiguous.'

  2. The eft would claim 'the exact' opposite if he had said nothing.

1
Darth_Venath 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think we’re on the same wave length? Maybe? LOL

Idk.

Dude I’ve had a rough year as far as politics is concerned. I wasn’t here at all, I was on the frontlines of fuckbook and my brain is not all together there at the moment.

I was trying to say pretty much everything you said.

I supported Trump, but I don’t idolize him. I support most of his agenda but not all of it. I care more about values and ideals than any one person. Sometimes we need a leader to help us realize those ideals, sometimes we need to step up and realize it for ourselves.

So, when I say I think he was covering his backside, that’s what it looks like to me because I’m anticipating what the leftists parrots are going to squawk at me. I can’t share anything anywhere without getting slammed for sharing sketchy unverifiable anything. Ironic yes.

1
cropduster 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think anything he said is ambiguous about breaking the law, violence, or vandalism unless you are a complete moron.

2
Darth_Venath 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m regurgitating what the leftist acquaintances I have regurgitate on to me.

I can’t keep myself isolated from them unfortunately.

1
LoveMeSomeTrumpies 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. I was so embarrassed watching the rioting at the Capital, like typical Antifa style those losers throwing garbage and jumping around like monkeys. Not to be inciteful (heh heh) but if the patriots had banded together and "marched" the Capital, it would NOT have looked like that.

7
Apocrs 7 points ago +7 / -0

He literally said "peacefully and patriotically" in that speech.

5
Darth_Venath 5 points ago +5 / -0

That’s what I heard. The left hears what they wanna believe.

6
stratocaster_patriot 6 points ago +6 / -0

I understand you are not dissing but I prefer Trump covering his ass than someone like Maxine Waters who openly calls for violence and has not need to cover her ass.

Living on our knees is where we are at. I don't know what to do. Sometimes what I want to do means I would probably be a one man revolution and end up shot by police in less than 10 minutes. What good would that do? But I am not joining the dark side and by that I assume you mean the left. Never join that or you have failed at life when it's all said and done.

1
Darth_Venath 1 point ago +2 / -1

I think we’re on the same wave length.