4775
Comments (599)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
86
USADNA 86 points ago +92 / -6

Yep! Even in a right to work state, if they haven’t documented any concern with performance in the past then his employer is going to have a tough time convincing a judge/jury about their grounds for termination. Get a lawyer that works on contingency and/or explore the road of an EEOC complaint.

Edit: if you push, they’ll be inclined to settle rather than take the risk of the publicity and risk involved with going to trial on this claim

42
SirPokeSmottington 42 points ago +47 / -5

Even in a right to work state

Fuckin stop with this stupid shit.

Right to work state DOES NOT MEAN WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO MAKE IT MEAN! PERIOD!


Under right-to-work laws, states have the authority to determine whether workers can be required to join a labor union to get or keep a job.


PERIOD! That is it!

24
travisestes 24 points ago +24 / -0

He probably means at will employment

1
TwoStar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Curious: where or under what circumstances is employment NOT at will?