5626
Comments (105)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
rockettails 4 points ago +4 / -0

You'd have a tiny minority of pearl clutchers hating him for his attitude (grab them by the... etc.).

This is such a non-issue too. The only issue I have with the situation that led to Bill's impeachment was that Lewinsky was a staffer. If it was just another consenting adult, unrelated to the administration, I wouldn't give a shit. I'd need relief if I was married to a harpy like Hill too. And JFK almost guaranteed bent some chicks over the Resolute desk. In the context of previous Presidents, what Trump said many moons ago was tame. But we live in a world today where words hold more weight than actions.

4
BigPanda71 4 points ago +4 / -0

It wasn’t even that Monica was a staffer. It was that Bill lied when questioned about it during the independent counsel investigation and, iirc, lied about it during his deposition in the Paula Jones case.

0
Meisenmouse 0 points ago +0 / -0

He shoulda admitted, "Yeah, I grabbed her by the p***y"

1
BigPanda71 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could have added in the second part too. “They let you.”

It seems so hard for people (on both sides) to admit that rich, powerful men are inundated with pussy. There is a certain kind of (non-feminist) woman who throws her self at people like Trump or Bill Clinton.

1
rockettails 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. Once you're wealthy enough to have safety, security and all the other lower tiers covered, there's only one thing else to think about.

2
theoldgrinch 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a non-issue, but it's a very real non-issue. I know people like that. "His rhetoric is bad"=>all they need.

1
rockettails 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've always found it ironic that people get offended at what a candidate says, but then vote for people who start forever wars for no reason.