PUBLIC HEARING – FULTON OPEN RECORDS REQUESTS – SHOW US THE BALLOTS
10 am, Fri. Jan 15th, 2021
Event Number: 179 501 0213
Event Password: This event requires registration. After your registration has been approved, you will receive instructions for joining the event.
——————————————————-
To join this online event
——————————————————-
-
Go to https://hencoga.webex.com/hencoga/j.php?MTID=ea060e2c247a6102b0f57c73d5698a5b4
-
Enter the event password: This event requires registration. After your registration has been approved, you will receive instructions for joining the event.
-
Click “Join Now”.
-
Follow the instructions that appear on your screen to join the teleconference.
——————————————————-
To only join the audio conference
——————————————————-
This event requires registration. After your registration has been approved, you will receive instructions for joining the event.
Fulton Co. Mail-In Ballot Inspection Case
Original Petition https://voterga.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/petition-for-declaratory-and-injunctive-relief-stamped.pdf
Exhibits & Affidavits https://voterga.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/notice-of-filing-exhibits.pdf Notice to Inspect https://voterga.files.wordpress.com/2021/01/notice-to-inspect-fulton-mail-in-ballots.pdf
Motion to Compel https://voterga.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/favorito-motion-to-compel-stamped.pdf
Supplemental Motion with Georgia Senate Letter https://voterga.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/favoritoemergencymotionsupplement.pdf
Objection to Transfer as an Election Contest https://voterga.files.wordpress.com/2021/01/favoritoobjection.docx
Brief in Support of Petitioners Right to Access Ballots
https://voterga.files.wordpress.com/2021/01/brief-iso-petitioners-right-of-access-to-ballots.docx
Protective Order Granting Temporary Injunction
2020 Election Affidavits by Garland Favorito
Affidavit by Garland Favorito regarding Dominion System Vote Flip in Presidential Race at Ware County https://voterga.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/dominion-vote-flip-affidavit-attachments.pdf
Affidavit by Garland Favorito about Georgia Audit & Recount Deficiencies https://voterga.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/garland-audit-recount-affidavit.pdf
Affidavit by Garland Favorito about 20,000 Fulton Vote Spike for Joe Biden https://voterga.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/fulton-biden-vote-spike-affidavit.pdf
+Cheeley begins questioning How did request end up with the Mariska if it did not come from you, Wit-i would get email but but she could work the ticket, how long Mariska been reporting to you, Wit-atleast 3 years, People can email in addition to portal-Wit affirmed, Def Exhbt#2(chain of emails from favaritto to mariska)-wit afirmed, DE#2 was sent to 5 people including ringer atty, is email valid request?-Wit he drags on answerign its valid but 3 days does not start till he gets it, We agree request was proper-Wit affirm (pltf e#5&7), you are not contesting proper notice-Wit affirmed and added 3 day didnt start, +Ringer reviews Petioners exhiit 12 appears to be called 7a & 7b, ringer to email witness the docs +technical problem from cheeley +Ringer Mr chilley can you hear us? Wit waiting, Ringer direct court to email & judge takes a little offense +Cheeley-Do u have PE#12-wit yes, Wit adds the email was "challenging" impling worded badly(wit smiles like its funny) +Cheeley Do you see the "not subject to records request?-Wit affirms, Cheeley cites the code that Mariska used to deny request and witness says he would not have done that as he is not familiar with that code section +Witness says its a legally adequat resposne even though its not accurate +Cheeley can u tell me what code section do u contend exempt cast ballots from being anayzed in response to open records quest-Wit-21.500 after certifiecation and witness then goes on to explain once its certified they are under seal and asks if he is correct... +Cheeley what code is county relying on?Wit-when i got request ballots were already certified which is correct wit goes on to explain if that was wrong then tyou can ammend(bingo) +Cheeley what about the discarded ballots?-Wit reads request and says and response and says "intersting" and says u would have to ask mariska and "this is far from a perfect response" +Cheeley before lunch you said you did not love the response?-Wit affirms +Cheeley is mariska a lawyer- Wit no as far as I know +Cheeley so you delegate requests to nonlawyer peeps? sometimes we mess up , do i get invovled in every one? no but i cant say exactly what happeneed +Cheeley is it unlawfaul request-Wit no it lawful properlly submitted +Cheeley mariska saying its an unlawful act you dont agree with then? Wit drams on and gives example unrelated to question citing he cant get into her head +Cheeley the ballots in querstion dont disclose voter info- Wit i dont know its not my dept. i have never seen a cast ballot +Missed one +Cheeley did you review the response mariska sent out-Wit i did not +Cheeley is it your job-Wit we get a lot sory we messed up +How many lawyers are there?-wit unclear +Cheeley asks again 40-50 lawyers in fulton law dept, are you othe one man show-Wit yes only atty If mariska reports to you and she is being told to respond then she has to ask you?Wit she can ask you and my presumption is she is aware of wht to do vs not maybe i will reeval her after this +Cheeley did u train mariska or supply code about election - wit i dont want to infringe on atty client but sure ive done that +Cheeley GA 1st ammend foundation packet on open government referenced,
open governemnt guide section referenced what is exempt vs not Cheeley then asks if its wit job to stay up to date on what is vs is not subject Ringer objects - Wit said he doesnt know the doc Cheeley - case law cited and davis vs city of macon case identified- Wit OK ive not read a brief in long time Cheeley- do you agree? Cheeleys reads words from case , do you agrere business out in the open for governemnt-wit agrees after hesitation moves to pltf E#12 adnitted w/o obj Cheeley begins question-ringer objections citing custodian dont know nothing-judge says u crazy mariska worked for him so ill allow it Cheeley reads code cited from mariska response (wit head bobbin along) Does that have anytjing to do with the request?-Wit i cant keep it in my lizard brain but i heards noone can touch it that is not deputized Cheeley argues with him and drops soem knowledge on the sucker Wit now arguing the code and recites SOS gave similar guidance that noone should be touching ballots Cheeley- GA law requires retain ballots for 2 years-Wit are we talkign about sent to clerk office I think thats right Cheeley if noone could touch those why would we save them?-Wit umm umm i disagree i can envision why we hold them and font let them Cheeley Do you have aproblem with our inspection of them-Wit no feelings about it whatsoever
Cheeley i wanted ballots in the request-Wit Sure Cheeley E#7a is summary of docs presented (635 pages) & none were related, do you see anywhere where she made those avaialble?-Wit i recall she directed you to the website and u pulled down everything from website(wit be cucked bois) Cheeley again repsonse was not responsive to ballots asked for?Wit goes to docs see what was attached "interesting" mr Cheeley maybe we are missing each other but mariska , hang on , is this the same request and wit reads from response Cheeley you gotta see both of them-Wit they are different Judge which exhbit are we looking at? page 2 E7 ringer pltf E#5 is that one, Cheeley yeah that the the response that both were included on WIT we get 100-200 at anytime and because zoom is how we are , can i log in and pull up the portal to verify this response is the one? ringer says ok jusge asks if he has the docs Cheeley says it shte drop box we talked about Wit asked to repsond judge says wait a minute
judge calls for recess for help ringer does E37 have #5 as 2nd page Cheeley yes judge back start with #7 and reask Cheeley mariska gave us one response and it covered both requests 28th & 29th-WIT I DO NOT, as i see them on portal there are two requests and two responses & mariska response had SOS guidance that says balklots are exempt Cheeley lets see if we can agree on this- PLTF #5 - Cheeley u see 29th req asks for paper ballots for all mail in and abstee counted in general elecotion, spoiled paper ballots cast or unable to be scanned, paper adjuscated ballots-wit agrees he sees that Cheeley is your testimony that for those items there is statute that noone can have access certified or not?-wit i think that the provision you read earlier may well say that, we are going to agree to disagree Cheeley that code seciton is election day wit - i wanna clarify- when i was advsied i was to testify i was unawre u had supplementned your requested , mariska provded imagaes are not subj to releease Cheeley lets cut to the chase - proper requests to the portal or not- wit me personally they were proper Cheeley then only rub is does GA let us se the ballots-is that fair summarry?-Wit i dont have an intrest but i will say dept does not want to give you this info , may be that inapprop. to charectize(holly shit) Cheeley where are the ballots- wit i dont know Cheeley are you aware spoilation order- wit no im not familiar with that Cheeley its a fact fulton did not make avaialbe or produce the abstee ballots per request-wit yes i pressume so we are hear Cheeley also true from E#5 29th request paragraph 5 & 6 none was provided - wit let me look #6 is not a question, wit reads, #6 is poorly worded , #5 she sent you to the website, the remainder is mostly ballot image which she told you were exempt Cheeley u understand req dont request source code? Wit u are beyond my knowledge of dominion, the word source code is not within this reoquest
2 questions about videa and underlying case ringer objects and judge scolds Cheeley Cheeley what did you practice before this-wit criminal law actually Cheeley do u understand if you respond bad u can waive your right to object later-wit generally sure Cheeley in this context fulton did not cite any statute that gave them the right to withold?-Wit maybe not that code mariska said might be valid and even so i dont know if statute citation required when not responding Cheeley do you know of any code that allows ballots to be exempt yes or not-wit mariska citation may and i have not researched it so i wont say Cheeley GA open recs law requires gov must popint to exemption if a claim is to be made that exemption is applied-wit that troubles ome where did you get the general assembly Cheeley gen ass. makes laws u know that wit yes Cheeley u agree they are resp. for laws- wit they are a part of it WIT court records are subject (red herring) Cheeley gen ass. has exhaustive list of not subject - woit its a list and there is more under law Cheeley are you aware mr cannfield in ---ringer objection wit does know of canfield publication (sour puss he knows this publication) Cheeley court order something - wit im not aware of case law saying you can disregard