Further on down they say this: "A study published by researchers at Imperial College London in June found that some 3.1 million deaths had been averted due to lockdowns across Europe early on in the pandemic, Reuters reported. Additional research found that 530 million coronavirus infections had been avoided due to early lockdowns in China, South Korea, Italy, Iran, France and the United States, according to the news outlet."
It's like with Western European immigration policies, you either close the borders to prevent the problem from coming into the country. Or you'll have to lock down the whole country and force people to stay in their own homes.
Further on down they say this: "A study published by researchers at Imperial College London in June found that some 3.1 million deaths had been averted due to lockdowns across Europe early on in the pandemic, Reuters reported. Additional research found that 530 million coronavirus infections had been avoided due to early lockdowns in China, South Korea, Italy, Iran, France and the United States, according to the news outlet."
So they thankfully linked to the study about the useless lockdowns but when they mention the other studies/research, they don't link anything to them. I wonder why not. https://www.newsweek.com/covid-lockdowns-have-no-clear-benefit-vs-other-voluntary-measures-international-study-shows-1561656
It's like with Western European immigration policies, you either close the borders to prevent the problem from coming into the country. Or you'll have to lock down the whole country and force people to stay in their own homes.
Ahh, this may be why: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/491315-imperial-college-covid-19-lockdown-saved-lives/