WOW. So instead of choosing to fold with dignity fighting the enemy, if corrupt courts cuck them, they chose to die a coward's death by committing suicide when under fire, in losing the loyalty of their audience? I forsee a mass exodus from their site, and deservedly so. I understand the logic---they are saying that the company didn't have a hand in stealing the election simply because their machines are designed to be able to steal elections,cand it was bad actors using them which did. Not buying that defense.
You built machines capable of fraudulent elections BY DESIGN, you pushed their sale and use in our elections, your manuals TEACH people how to commit voter fraud (not bugs or errors or oversights, but programmed into system), and people used the machines AND manuals which trained them to commit voter fraud. In conspiracy charges before the law, every party is guilty of complicity when a crime has been committed or conspired, even without full knowledge of the activities of the other parties. Dominion provided the means and the training to commit the fraudulent election results, therefore they are complicit.
How did they prove that? Did they prove the machines can't do fractional counts? Did they prove the machines don't hook to the internet, ever? Did they prove the data did not go overseas? Did they prove the glitches that all favored Biden were human error? Did they disprove the CNN footage wherein we see the votes switch on live tv? Did they prove there was no 5% bump for Biden in all the precincts that used Dominion? Did they prove an operator can't change someone's vote? Did they prove operators can't feed the same ballots over and over? Did they prove the signature match requirements can't be essentially disabled? Did they prove the settings can't be tampered with to force 68% of ballots into adjudication? Because I didn't see any of this proof, and I'd like to.
Their statement reads like something written by a hostage. Just saying.
Getting sued for more than they’re worth probably, can’t take the heat
American Thinker now American Drinker
WOW. So instead of choosing to fold with dignity fighting the enemy, if corrupt courts cuck them, they chose to die a coward's death by committing suicide when under fire, in losing the loyalty of their audience? I forsee a mass exodus from their site, and deservedly so. I understand the logic---they are saying that the company didn't have a hand in stealing the election simply because their machines are designed to be able to steal elections,cand it was bad actors using them which did. Not buying that defense.
You built machines capable of fraudulent elections BY DESIGN, you pushed their sale and use in our elections, your manuals TEACH people how to commit voter fraud (not bugs or errors or oversights, but programmed into system), and people used the machines AND manuals which trained them to commit voter fraud. In conspiracy charges before the law, every party is guilty of complicity when a crime has been committed or conspired, even without full knowledge of the activities of the other parties. Dominion provided the means and the training to commit the fraudulent election results, therefore they are complicit.
Its the purge....
Not buying it.
they shat their pants
I believe that eventually we will find out that these allegations were absolutely true.
"...and proved the allegations were libel" BWHAAHAHHA HAHAHAHAH you get an updoot sir for making me laugh
Dominion hasn’t proved anything.
How did they prove that? Did they prove the machines can't do fractional counts? Did they prove the machines don't hook to the internet, ever? Did they prove the data did not go overseas? Did they prove the glitches that all favored Biden were human error? Did they disprove the CNN footage wherein we see the votes switch on live tv? Did they prove there was no 5% bump for Biden in all the precincts that used Dominion? Did they prove an operator can't change someone's vote? Did they prove operators can't feed the same ballots over and over? Did they prove the signature match requirements can't be essentially disabled? Did they prove the settings can't be tampered with to force 68% of ballots into adjudication? Because I didn't see any of this proof, and I'd like to.