Nitter calls twitter's backend without exposing your private data. It uses their infrastructure but contributes nothing to their data collection, which is how they generate revenue.
Nitter is absolutely the best way to consume twitter content, privately, without helping their bottom line.
Many content creators still post based content to twitter, like Ngo and Posobiec. Use nitter to see what they are up to, but never twitter itself.
Soon the likes of Ngo and Posobiec will jump ship. They're late to the party but will be welcome on the alt platforms whenever they finally see the big picture and migrate away from big tech.
nitter still talks to twitter, meaning that twitter knows when something is "hot". we need to not give twitter information
Does every request go to twitter or is it a one time archive?
https://nitter.net.about
Nitter calls twitter's backend without exposing your private data. It uses their infrastructure but contributes nothing to their data collection, which is how they generate revenue.
Nitter, never twitter.
Incorrect, we need to tax twitter's infrastructure, without contributing any revenue generating data.
This is how it works:
https://nitter.net.about
Nitter is absolutely the best way to consume twitter content, privately, without helping their bottom line.
Many content creators still post based content to twitter, like Ngo and Posobiec. Use nitter to see what they are up to, but never twitter itself.
Soon the likes of Ngo and Posobiec will jump ship. They're late to the party but will be welcome on the alt platforms whenever they finally see the big picture and migrate away from big tech.
using their resources, good. no ad revenues, good. they learn what is hot amongst conservatives, not good. it is a dilemma
Not a legitimate concern, as that is not data they can monetize.
If that data points them at who to censor next, then good. Streisand effect will strike again.