Better then having a whole legal industry with new 18yo women engaging in it and amateurs constantly producing it. Overall, there would be a decline in production imo. We'd need to enforce the laws too, obviously.
Well, I think IP needs to be revamped. I'm not convinced it's a good thing, at all. Needs to significantly be reduced IMO.
Central banking also needs to be changed. The government should honestly be banned from taking on any debt except in times of conventional war. I am not convinced keeping inflation at 2% and having a central bank interfere in markets is a good thing at all.
I actually think most social problems in society (stuff like porn, adultery, etc...) would disappear if we reduced government regulations/tax + redistribution. I think the more we move toward a communist society where we oppress the competent people to redistribute toward the less competent and force equality no matter how incompetent a person is, the more entitled people become, the less appreciative they become, the more selfish people become, the less overall happiness, romance and positive relationships develop because our entire society is grounded in essentially immorality in believing everyone should be a CEO but some sort of systematic oppression exists so it's justified to take from others without putting in any effort.
Get rid of the government influence and a lot of social problems will disappear. Why do people turn to all these vices? Because they hate their lives, typically, one way or another. The government's influence is a huge problem in that.
I don’t think we need to change what works, just the holes in the boat
IP is abused by Disney and patent lawyers ... there must be a solution to those two problems ... perhaps stop giving corporation human rights (like IP) could be one, or the state stop funding litigation (court costs for frivolous lawsuits)
Central banking is a tough one ... it’s been tried before, the Jeffersonian balanced budget surplus fueled the Jacksonian spending spree and the Reagan Clinton surplus fueled the Bush Obama wars. Maybe the state should be constantly broke ... and begging for money. As for money supply ... competing currency have been tried before and have always been a problem with speculation ... but then again what isn’t ?
The Victorian age in America was unparalleled in its freedom... and moral rectitude... decried by liberals as hypocrite and celebrated by conservatives as exemplary ... it was also the time of economic growth, population expansion and industrialization.
Most people are libertarians ... they just don’t like the name because they think it means licensure and vice ...
I would argue you aren't libertarian and are something else. You have a romanticized version of what libertarians are. In my experience, libertarians can in fact be described as people who believe objective morality is repressive of freedom.so most libertarians strive for subjective morality in which anyone can do anything and government enforces nothing when it comes to morality.
If that's not you, I don't think you're a libertarian. You sound more like a Christian Conservative/Liberal or just conservative, period. Regardless the labels are pretty unimportant anyway I'd say.
Better then having a whole legal industry with new 18yo women engaging in it and amateurs constantly producing it. Overall, there would be a decline in production imo. We'd need to enforce the laws too, obviously.
Well, I think IP needs to be revamped. I'm not convinced it's a good thing, at all. Needs to significantly be reduced IMO.
Central banking also needs to be changed. The government should honestly be banned from taking on any debt except in times of conventional war. I am not convinced keeping inflation at 2% and having a central bank interfere in markets is a good thing at all.
I actually think most social problems in society (stuff like porn, adultery, etc...) would disappear if we reduced government regulations/tax + redistribution. I think the more we move toward a communist society where we oppress the competent people to redistribute toward the less competent and force equality no matter how incompetent a person is, the more entitled people become, the less appreciative they become, the more selfish people become, the less overall happiness, romance and positive relationships develop because our entire society is grounded in essentially immorality in believing everyone should be a CEO but some sort of systematic oppression exists so it's justified to take from others without putting in any effort.
Get rid of the government influence and a lot of social problems will disappear. Why do people turn to all these vices? Because they hate their lives, typically, one way or another. The government's influence is a huge problem in that.
It’s easier to fix than to construct
I don’t think we need to change what works, just the holes in the boat
IP is abused by Disney and patent lawyers ... there must be a solution to those two problems ... perhaps stop giving corporation human rights (like IP) could be one, or the state stop funding litigation (court costs for frivolous lawsuits)
Central banking is a tough one ... it’s been tried before, the Jeffersonian balanced budget surplus fueled the Jacksonian spending spree and the Reagan Clinton surplus fueled the Bush Obama wars. Maybe the state should be constantly broke ... and begging for money. As for money supply ... competing currency have been tried before and have always been a problem with speculation ... but then again what isn’t ?
The Victorian age in America was unparalleled in its freedom... and moral rectitude... decried by liberals as hypocrite and celebrated by conservatives as exemplary ... it was also the time of economic growth, population expansion and industrialization.
Most people are libertarians ... they just don’t like the name because they think it means licensure and vice ...
I would argue you aren't libertarian and are something else. You have a romanticized version of what libertarians are. In my experience, libertarians can in fact be described as people who believe objective morality is repressive of freedom.so most libertarians strive for subjective morality in which anyone can do anything and government enforces nothing when it comes to morality.
If that's not you, I don't think you're a libertarian. You sound more like a Christian Conservative/Liberal or just conservative, period. Regardless the labels are pretty unimportant anyway I'd say.