No, because it’s Co owned by Ben Shapiro who espouses the aforementioned views.
If she comes out and wants to talk about the blatant and ignored election fraud, I’ll support her, if all she wants to talk about is race issues, I don’t give a shit.
I get that you’re super proud to have her as an “ally” because you think it makes conservatives look less racist, you’re welcome to it - but DW IS Shapiro. No one else knows who the fuck works there. He’s one of the most famous “conservatives” in the country, whether you like it or not and he is the face of DW, for better or worse. He has one of if not THE largest podcasts on politics and certainly on this side of the aisle. Her joining his team where he flagrantly talks down the President and denies any election abnormality is damaging. Period.
So she gets zero credit for signing onto Ben Shapiro’s company, unless she actively disassociates her self from his views on the subject.
Fuck this shit it's bad enough with the left trying to censor everything and decide for us what we can or can't watch with viewpoint policing to the point of insanity.
If you want to point out it's a shame she's signed onto that network fine but forcing everyone to participate in your sweeping boycott is too much.
I'll throw out one of my next points for the readers in case you've disengaged.
When you argue with Islamic Dawahists, one of the things they'll say is that the Gospels don't claim that Christ is God. When you say the Gospels do, they'll say "where does Jesus say 'I am God, worship me'?".
Which of course, the Gospels never contain those words. It uses very clear context and reference to make the case, but does not fit into the narrow and unfair frame that the Dawahist has set. And because of this, they pretend it doesn't make the claim at all.
You're doing the same thing, whether you realize it or not. She's not saying the exact things you want, so you're pretending like she's not talking about the fraud at all when in reality she's talked about it publicly multiple times both before and after contracting with DW. Even in the video to which you're replying. By pretending that she isn't, you're exposing yourself as either ignorant or dishonest.
Because I wanted to make sure you saw it rather than simply editing my other post. Because you're arguing like a dumbass and need to be called out. Now in the "post on the other thread" (same thread, chief) you've added a form of ad hominem which is just another layer of dishonest debate tactics.
Does she get credit for also signing on with Knowles at DW who has been ride or die since 2016?
Of course not. Because guys like you just want to bitch.
No, because it’s Co owned by Ben Shapiro who espouses the aforementioned views.
If she comes out and wants to talk about the blatant and ignored election fraud, I’ll support her, if all she wants to talk about is race issues, I don’t give a shit.
Co owned with Boering who does not share Ben's views on the election.
So back to "just want to bitch"
I get that you’re super proud to have her as an “ally” because you think it makes conservatives look less racist, you’re welcome to it - but DW IS Shapiro. No one else knows who the fuck works there. He’s one of the most famous “conservatives” in the country, whether you like it or not and he is the face of DW, for better or worse. He has one of if not THE largest podcasts on politics and certainly on this side of the aisle. Her joining his team where he flagrantly talks down the President and denies any election abnormality is damaging. Period.
So she gets zero credit for signing onto Ben Shapiro’s company, unless she actively disassociates her self from his views on the subject.
This is the type of gatekeeping that leads to circlejerking on the chans and driving away the normies while the left eats the entire nation.
Good luck with your ideological purity. The boys and I got a nation to save.
Fuck this shit it's bad enough with the left trying to censor everything and decide for us what we can or can't watch with viewpoint policing to the point of insanity.
If you want to point out it's a shame she's signed onto that network fine but forcing everyone to participate in your sweeping boycott is too much.
I'll throw out one of my next points for the readers in case you've disengaged.
When you argue with Islamic Dawahists, one of the things they'll say is that the Gospels don't claim that Christ is God. When you say the Gospels do, they'll say "where does Jesus say 'I am God, worship me'?".
Which of course, the Gospels never contain those words. It uses very clear context and reference to make the case, but does not fit into the narrow and unfair frame that the Dawahist has set. And because of this, they pretend it doesn't make the claim at all.
You're doing the same thing, whether you realize it or not. She's not saying the exact things you want, so you're pretending like she's not talking about the fraud at all when in reality she's talked about it publicly multiple times both before and after contracting with DW. Even in the video to which you're replying. By pretending that she isn't, you're exposing yourself as either ignorant or dishonest.
Dunno why you felt the need to respond twice to the same post, see the other thread for my response.
Because I wanted to make sure you saw it rather than simply editing my other post. Because you're arguing like a dumbass and need to be called out. Now in the "post on the other thread" (same thread, chief) you've added a form of ad hominem which is just another layer of dishonest debate tactics.
Step up your game bro