I'll throw out one of my next points for the readers in case you've disengaged.
When you argue with Islamic Dawahists, one of the things they'll say is that the Gospels don't claim that Christ is God. When you say the Gospels do, they'll say "where does Jesus say 'I am God, worship me'?".
Which of course, the Gospels never contain those words. It uses very clear context and reference to make the case, but does not fit into the narrow and unfair frame that the Dawahist has set. And because of this, they pretend it doesn't make the claim at all.
You're doing the same thing, whether you realize it or not. She's not saying the exact things you want, so you're pretending like she's not talking about the fraud at all when in reality she's talked about it publicly multiple times both before and after contracting with DW. Even in the video to which you're replying. By pretending that she isn't, you're exposing yourself as either ignorant or dishonest.
Because I wanted to make sure you saw it rather than simply editing my other post. Because you're arguing like a dumbass and need to be called out. Now in the "post on the other thread" (same thread, chief) you've added a form of ad hominem which is just another layer of dishonest debate tactics.
Not sure why you feel the need to discuss (presumably because I’ve hurt your feelings pertaining to CO), but each “branch” reply off of a comment is referred to as a thread, hence the ability to view the “full comment thread” when using context.
I'll throw out one of my next points for the readers in case you've disengaged.
When you argue with Islamic Dawahists, one of the things they'll say is that the Gospels don't claim that Christ is God. When you say the Gospels do, they'll say "where does Jesus say 'I am God, worship me'?".
Which of course, the Gospels never contain those words. It uses very clear context and reference to make the case, but does not fit into the narrow and unfair frame that the Dawahist has set. And because of this, they pretend it doesn't make the claim at all.
You're doing the same thing, whether you realize it or not. She's not saying the exact things you want, so you're pretending like she's not talking about the fraud at all when in reality she's talked about it publicly multiple times both before and after contracting with DW. Even in the video to which you're replying. By pretending that she isn't, you're exposing yourself as either ignorant or dishonest.
Dunno why you felt the need to respond twice to the same post, see the other thread for my response.
Because I wanted to make sure you saw it rather than simply editing my other post. Because you're arguing like a dumbass and need to be called out. Now in the "post on the other thread" (same thread, chief) you've added a form of ad hominem which is just another layer of dishonest debate tactics.
Step up your game bro
Not sure why you feel the need to discuss (presumably because I’ve hurt your feelings pertaining to CO), but each “branch” reply off of a comment is referred to as a thread, hence the ability to view the “full comment thread” when using context.