670
Comments (40)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-1
KitKatCat -1 points ago +1 / -2

Again you don't need martial law to charge people with a crime. Martial law is the direct control of the military over normal civil functions. Again you don't need that to arrest people for a crime or to even try them in Military court if it applies. So if its not meant to gain more control over the general public then I dont see why he would use it.

1
Sandersballistics 1 point ago +1 / -0

You seem to be quite stupid or a shill. All the cases in the states were ignored. Nobody was charged with a crime because of deep corruption, this is where martial law and the insurrection act can be used to straighten things out.

0
KitKatCat 0 points ago +1 / -1

okay here we go with the insults. You clearly don't understand what I'm saying. Anyway have a good day/night. This site is shit sometimes. Between weeks of disinformation, q bs, and shouting Martial law or IA on here. Then when someone wants to have an actual conversation. As soon as they say something people dont like they call them a shill or an idiot. Again the president has limits. What hurt Trump in his cases is that he didn't seem to have any backing from the DOD/doj etc..Barr came out against him. The DNI report was a dud. No body cares about what Rudy has to say. If Miller or Pompeo gave a press conference tomorrow stating dominion was compromised in the solarwinds hack or there was direct fraud related to fake ballots and flipped votes. NO way the msm ignores it. Not even congress. At the very least a investigation would be done. Trump had non of that happen. Which means 2 things. 1. anyone loyal to him in the DOD weren't able to gather evidence or 2. the deep state is just that deep and almost everyone betrayed him.So who would follow this martial law order? The deep state dod? the deep state generals? We are not a dictatorship. As far as the DOD/military is concerned Trump lost. Following any of his orders to over turn an election would be unconstitutional and a literal coup. If Trump had the backing of the DOD on the election fraud that would be different.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
KitKatCat 0 points ago +1 / -1

when did i say there was no crimes committed!! Does the military accept that there was crimes committed???? Did Barr accept there was crimes committed? Does Pence? Does MIller? These are the people Trump needs to get to accept it! I want them to. I'm still holding out hope that the Intelligence community/DOD will come thru for him. I'm not a fucking shill! You need to learn to have better reading comprehension.

1
Sandersballistics 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are full of shit. He would not be overturning the election because he legally won. People broke the law at every level to give Biden the "win". Show me in the constitution where it says the president should do nothing if the election was obviously a sham! Other presidents have used the insurrection act for EXACTLY this reason. Again I think you are shill bitch. Go write another book reply that doesn't say anything.

0
KitKatCat 0 points ago +1 / -1

You can't read!!! Dumbass. Okay point me to one fucking active DOD/Military general that believes the election was stolen and will follow Trumps orders???? I swear your fucking low IQ. Its not what we know its what we can prove. And the official narrative accepted by everyone in the places Trump need (at least publicly) is Trump lost. Again if they believe differently then show me?? So far the only support Trump has had with the election has been his lawyers. I believe the election was stolen but Trump needs the military to believe it was stolen? NOW GO SUCK HUNTERS SKITTLE DICK> YOU RETARD.