This. Julian Assange takes on as much of the risk as possible for his informants. Something that has cost him dearly. If he hasn't named Seth Rich, he has a reason. It may have been Rich's own request to protect his family. It could be more than that. We don't know.
I just want to find his murderer. And I'll call out whoever stands in the way of that. I have a billion times more respect for Seth Rich than Jullian Assange.
Democrats say Seth Rich was one of Assanges informants.
Assange has not said this, and even if Seth Rich was one of Assanges informants, what makes you think Assange betrayed Rich?
News flash: the DNC and all corporate networks have logging on them, they would know who accessed documents and copied them without needing anyone else to tell them.
Most likely, the DNC hired their own goons to take Rich out without any external interference.
If Assange had came out and said "Seth Rich was my source for the leaked DNC emails", Seth's murder investigation would have reopened with a huge motive for his death. Instead, Assange keeps silent in order to try to get himself more favorable terms for showing people how to hack into systems (instead of being just the recipient).
Massive public attention. That's what would happen.
Anyone considering whistleblowing to WikiLeaks would stop instantly because they would no longer be safe.
They wouldn't feel safe because Assange tried to obtain justice for one of his murdered informants? By letting Seth's murder go unavenged, it would make me less likely to be a whistleblower for wikileaks.
One of his murdered informants disagrees. Why not seek justice for him?
HIS NAME WAS SETH RICH.
The deepstate killed him. Seth Rich knew the risk. He is a hero.
You are doing him a disservice with your vile attempts at shifting the blame.
This. Julian Assange takes on as much of the risk as possible for his informants. Something that has cost him dearly. If he hasn't named Seth Rich, he has a reason. It may have been Rich's own request to protect his family. It could be more than that. We don't know.
Seth Rich was literally murdered. Assange is like the boss who takes all of the credit for an employee's hard work and sacrifice.
Assange is in prison. His name has been dragged through the mud.
I just want to find his murderer. And I'll call out whoever stands in the way of that. I have a billion times more respect for Seth Rich than Jullian Assange.
We all want to find his murderer.
All of us except Assange. He has the power to blow the case wide open and shine a massive spotlight on it. Yet, he doesn't.
Democrats say Seth Rich was one of Assanges informants.
Assange has not said this, and even if Seth Rich was one of Assanges informants, what makes you think Assange betrayed Rich?
News flash: the DNC and all corporate networks have logging on them, they would know who accessed documents and copied them without needing anyone else to tell them.
Most likely, the DNC hired their own goons to take Rich out without any external interference.
If Assange had came out and said "Seth Rich was my source for the leaked DNC emails", Seth's murder investigation would have reopened with a huge motive for his death. Instead, Assange keeps silent in order to try to get himself more favorable terms for showing people how to hack into systems (instead of being just the recipient).
What would happen if he came out with it?
Anyone considering whistleblowing to WikiLeaks would stop instantly because they would no longer be safe.
Massive public attention. That's what would happen.
They wouldn't feel safe because Assange tried to obtain justice for one of his murdered informants? By letting Seth's murder go unavenged, it would make me less likely to be a whistleblower for wikileaks.