431 North Dakota Republicans introduce bill to allows user to sue Big Tech over censorship in state. The proposed bill could ensure that social media giants such as Twitter and Facebook would be liable in a civil lawsuit for North Dakota residents "whose speech is restricted, censored, or suppressed," (media.thedonald.win) posted 6 days ago by I-am-Orlando +431 / -0 9 comments share 9 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (9) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 6 ▼ – RandomPanda 6 points 6 days ago +6 / -0 Language too ambiguous and essentially duplicate the shit show of section 230. This is a token effort or ND Republicans are some stupid bastards. permalink save report block reply ▲ 5 ▼ – deleted 5 points 6 days ago +5 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – Nunyo 3 points 6 days ago +3 / -0 "Obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent or harassing, or otherwise objectionable." No, this isnt subjective or anything. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – Susurro 2 points 6 days ago +2 / -0 Oklahoma did this the other day. I like this trend. Now give it teeth! https://rumble.com/vcste7-social-media-censorship-bill-proposed.html permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – RussianBlyat 1 point 6 days ago +1 / -0 If they can get the law to work, wouldn't that allow citizens of other states to sue these companies in North Dakota? NAL, but from what I understand this would be possible under the long arm statues since the companies operate their business inside the state. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Spectre001 1 point 6 days ago +1 / -0 That's useless. They'll just say "IT'S RAYCIS, HATEFUL, AND OBJECTIONABLE!! ORANGE MAN BAD!!!" when they report it permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Latinalover 1 point 6 days ago +1 / -0 Anybody from Greg Abbotts office in TX listening? permalink save report block reply ▲ 0 ▼ – deleted 0 points 6 days ago +1 / -1 ▲ 1 ▼ – tootthebighorn 1 point 6 days ago +1 / -0 So far Sec. 230 hasn't overruled anything. permalink parent save report block reply
Language too ambiguous and essentially duplicate the shit show of section 230. This is a token effort or ND Republicans are some stupid bastards.
"Obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent or harassing, or otherwise objectionable." No, this isnt subjective or anything.
Oklahoma did this the other day. I like this trend. Now give it teeth! https://rumble.com/vcste7-social-media-censorship-bill-proposed.html
If they can get the law to work, wouldn't that allow citizens of other states to sue these companies in North Dakota?
NAL, but from what I understand this would be possible under the long arm statues since the companies operate their business inside the state.
That's useless. They'll just say "IT'S RAYCIS, HATEFUL, AND OBJECTIONABLE!! ORANGE MAN BAD!!!" when they report it
Anybody from Greg Abbotts office in TX listening?
So far Sec. 230 hasn't overruled anything.