2017
Comments (67)
sorted by:
106
Siteless_Vagrant 106 points ago +109 / -3

Fortunately for them, no law enforcement will arrest them, and even if they did, no court would convict them. 2 tiers, buddy. Me and you are on the bottom one.

57
deleted 57 points ago +58 / -1
31
JMaN 31 points ago +31 / -0

I'm just a guy on the internet... I would assume military intelligence may have a clearer picture of the shenanigans that took place on election night. Some may even have a bit of a problem with it.

15
Trump__Supporter 15 points ago +15 / -0

Or, if they are snakes, will just use it to blackmail "the president" into getting anything they want.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
-3
Newaccountagain -3 points ago +4 / -7

News flash. They will be. They exist to back the state- all that fancy fluff in the oath is just wind.

15
deleted 15 points ago +16 / -1
2
preparation-H 2 points ago +2 / -0

For real. High Energy is the way forward! Always!

2
Devildtails 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s why we have the Insurrection Act; it authorizes the military to conduct law enforcement activities when law enforcement fails.

2
Patriot_Cabbage 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd rather be a deplorable pede than one of these elite cunts!

We might be pedes, but there's an awful lot of us!

61
marishiten 61 points ago +61 / -0

Holy shit. This is on official letterhead and signed by these cunts.

What else is needed? This is fucking sedition.

LETS GO FBI GET THE FUCK ON IT YOU CANNOT HIDE THEIR SHIT ANYMORE THEYVE OVEREXTENDED

33
I_Love_45-70_Gov 33 points ago +33 / -0

FBI...lololol.

Thanks for the laugh, Pede.

4
Patriot_Cabbage 4 points ago +4 / -0

The FBI is Deep State As fuuuuuuck!

They're reading your comment and laughing at us peasants.

8
VoterIDMatters 8 points ago +9 / -1

its fake

look at the text blocks photoshopped on

10
CornPop2024 10 points ago +10 / -0

Nope. Link. This is from 2018, but doesn't make it any less real.

-6
VoterIDMatters -6 points ago +2 / -8

SO POST THATIT IS TWO FUCKING YEARS OLD THEN, JACKASS

The obvious implication is that it is new if you dont make it clear that it is old

it is LESS RELEVANT SINCE IT IS TWO YEARS OLD

7
CornPop2024 7 points ago +7 / -0

I wasn't the one that posted it, JACKASS.

Also, 2018 is seen in the OP, but I agree it can easily be misconstrued with the recent de-classification.

1
Patriot_Cabbage 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was about to take a hit of that hopium, and now I find out that the cup was empty!!!

Thanks for pointing that out.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Patriot_Cabbage 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's a cropped image. that's embedded in that tweet. That's just how it looks.

1
james43552352345 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just assume anything coming from twatter is fake

1
Grond999 1 point ago +1 / -0

LOL! The FBI

29
KuzoKevin 29 points ago +29 / -0

This is sedition. The Supreme Court should address this immediately.

19
ProphetOfKek 19 points ago +20 / -1

I think I can speak on their behalf: “sod off, citizen.”

8
BillionsAndBillions 8 points ago +8 / -0

No standing. Slaves have no standing.

4
KuzoKevin 4 points ago +4 / -0

You are probably right.

4
lanman 4 points ago +4 / -0

Standing says, "no".

3
_-Th0r-_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

Blatant assault on the separation of powers

19
Grindelwald 19 points ago +19 / -0

They had no authority regarding declassification.

12
NighT93 12 points ago +12 / -0

Too bad

  1. They have no authority over declassification
  2. this is back from 2018, it was irrelevant then and it is now.
10
BoominZoomer 10 points ago +10 / -0

Is that seriously Pelosi's signature? Looks like a middle school girl writing when cheerleading practice is

9
ProudlyConservative 9 points ago +9 / -0

If FEMA is actually in charge under the President's PEADs, then you don't have to go through SCOTUS

Presidential Emergency Action Documents - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_Emergency_Action_Documents

2
Election_Quotes 2 points ago +2 / -0

PEADs to the rescue!

6
VoterIDMatters 6 points ago +6 / -0

why are you posting old shit like it’s new?

6
TrumpLovesPussy 6 points ago +6 / -0

why does this pic look like it's been passed around since 1993

3
NighT93 3 points ago +3 / -0

it's from 2018.

5
Bramage 5 points ago +5 / -0

"gang of eight"?

I call bullshit.

1
TenaciousDT 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, these are my current thoughts as well, plus if it was from 2018, we'd have heard of it already. Plus the language just sounds off.

4
Tailgunnerjoe 4 points ago +4 / -0

Didn’t Warner collude with a Russian national to overthrow the government?

4
Allison 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think Nancy blew it when she demanded the nuclear codes. She had no right and what the heck are they so afraid of? Is she not aware her father’s file has already been released?? They work for us- and WE demand to know the truth. We’ve been lied to for the last time.

And last time I checked- the military is under the EXECUTIVE branch- not the Legislative branch...

3
FakeNametag 3 points ago +3 / -0

I find it unprofessional that our Congress uses the term "Gang of Eight" in an official document.

3
Omnes_Omnibus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Laws and the Constitution are only as good as their just enforcement.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
sesquipedalienator 2 points ago +2 / -0

And it will only become more brazen. I mean what do you do when you openly steal an election and NONE of our institutions that were set in place to protect us will do anything? What you do is go for broke. The next four years will be very, very revealing.

2
PatriotPleb 2 points ago +2 / -0

On a side note, Pelosi’s signature is worse than my 8yr olds hand writing

2
Thegreatestrecovery 2 points ago +2 / -0

They keep referring to the "Gang of 8" as though it were a real, legal entity with Constitutional authority, but it's just 8 people with no real legal authority to demand this.

2
Trumpdidit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also take note that the declassified documents shine light on criminal doings, by these four swamp creatures. They are attempting to get in front of any and all publicity that Trump will show the public of the corrupt dealings they 've committed.

2
Newaccountagain 2 points ago +2 / -0

Watch as yet again nothing happens. They are above the law.

1
King_Boobus_Toobus 1 point ago +1 / -0

And no one will do anything about it...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
TuckerCarlson2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

No?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Scrubattack 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's no standards for democrats.

1
InterloperKO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like they need to write these letters..

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
StadiumHopper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Once again Congress does not sustain or uphold the constitution of the United States. National Security is administered by the President and right now, that is Donald Trump.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
RedFoxOnFire 1 point ago +1 / -0

Two bad we don't have a law enforcement agency to arrest them.

Or a DOJ to prosecut them.

1
HalfBreedSupremacist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just tried the link:

Page not found The requested page "/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Letter-to-Coats-Rosenstein-Wray.pdf?platform=hootsuite" could not be found.

2
mikethemarine 2 points ago +2 / -0

the letter was written Sept. 2018 has NO barring

1
geotus3000 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be fair, SCOTUS ruled the President has no standing in our Republic.

1
acasper 1 point ago +1 / -0

When you call yourself a gang that’s not a great sign that what you’re doing is above board.

1
ArizonaDesertRat2021 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait...I thought the Obama cabal was putting orders through and writing CYA letters to themselves up to the last second.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
TheBehavingBeaver 1 point ago +1 / -0

saved

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1