Where? I’m looking to document this stuff because Rudy et. al. Did a terrible job on follow up and there are tangible actions we can take to uncover the fraud related to running ballots through the machines multiple times. Anywhere that they certified 100%+ turnout is a good place to start looking.
In one of the Kraken cases an affidavit claimed turnout figures were over 100%, unknown how the affiant came to that conclusion. Official sources don't show it, nor would you expect them to because if state officials had seen this data they would've either not certified the election, or assuming they're in on it, purged the information from public view.
The most likely scenario is that the affiant was simply wrong due to using outdated voter registration data.
Unfortunately the only place I saw it was an infographic alongside other ridiculous stats like a list of voters born during the civil war etc. I did not verify any of it.
I take people at their word. I happen to be very confident that he is wrong, because I’ve been looking, but I have to assume patriots are telling the truth. Or else, what are we left with?
That's much better than Vladimir Putin who get 95% or Kim Jong Un's 99.5%, both commonly accused for election fraud by leftist and MSM because the numbers are "too damn high to be real".
In some counties he even got 130% turnout!
I saw over 200% in several areas.
Where? I’m looking to document this stuff because Rudy et. al. Did a terrible job on follow up and there are tangible actions we can take to uncover the fraud related to running ballots through the machines multiple times. Anywhere that they certified 100%+ turnout is a good place to start looking.
In one of the Kraken cases an affidavit claimed turnout figures were over 100%, unknown how the affiant came to that conclusion. Official sources don't show it, nor would you expect them to because if state officials had seen this data they would've either not certified the election, or assuming they're in on it, purged the information from public view.
The most likely scenario is that the affiant was simply wrong due to using outdated voter registration data.
Unfortunately the only place I saw it was an infographic alongside other ridiculous stats like a list of voters born during the civil war etc. I did not verify any of it.
I take people at their word. I happen to be very confident that he is wrong, because I’ve been looking, but I have to assume patriots are telling the truth. Or else, what are we left with?
You know you’re getting deported, right?
That's much better than Vladimir Putin who get 95% or Kim Jong Un's 99.5%, both commonly accused for election fraud by leftist and MSM because the numbers are "too damn high to be real".