No, it is not solid in the least bit. When a state conducts it’s election in a manner against it’s own Constitution, and with a state supreme court that rules against the plain text of the law, then there is a corrupt state government. As a republic of united states, it is both the duty and obligation for the federal government to intervene. Also, there is precedence for intervening. Rand has applied ZERO constitutional logic; his reasoning is worse than fundamentally flawed, it is lacking entirely.
No, it is not solid in the least bit. When a state conducts it’s election in a manner against it’s own Constitution, and with a state supreme court that rules against the plain text of the law, then there is a corrupt state government. As a republic of united states, it is both the duty and obligation for the federal government to intervene. Also, there is precedence for intervening. Rand has applied ZERO constitutional logic; his reasoning is worse than fundamentally flawed, it is lacking entirely.