105
Comments (32)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
FucKamala 4 points ago +5 / -1

That would only take about 100. The 25-30k is for us

5
LiberatedDeathStar 5 points ago +5 / -0

How is 25-30k for us? Quit being a fucking retard. DC is a liberal ass city, there's no 'us' there!

6
FucKamala 6 points ago +7 / -1

Because you dont need that many soldiers to handle politicians. You need that many to squash revolt. Ever been in combat? I spent years in Iraq and never saw that many soldiers

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
LiberatedDeathStar 3 points ago +3 / -0

What revolt is going to be there? How many Trump supporters are in DC?

If they're there to stop us, they're looking in the wrong place.

2
Egglet 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are preparing for the coming attack, all these troops in DC is for protection and that's a strong warning that the government is about to do something that will piss off the whole country, like maybe gun grabs?

2
stepping_razor123 2 points ago +2 / -0

THAT is what is so intriguing about this whole affair!

(to be transparent I smoked some hopium today but I have doomed before too)

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
FucKamala 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe. Most of them are unarmed and can't keep their pants above their ass cheeks. I still think 100 soldiers would have been sufficient

2
Niqlndym 2 points ago +2 / -0

They also need that to convince the Trump administration that they need to leave the Whitehouse. Remember the Podesta Election War Games simulation? That had the Secret Service forcibly removing Trump...Nancy and Mitch just don’t want to take any chances...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0