I mean, they explicitly included the reason why the right to keep arms specifically (as opposed to other forms of property) shall not be infringed, so it matters. The Constitution offers no such absolute protection of the right to own any and all other forms of property.
I mean, they explicitly included the reason why the right to keep arms specifically (as opposed to other forms of property) shall not be infringed, so it matters. The Constitution offers no such absolute protection of the right to own any and all other forms of property.