3790
Comments (79)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
MAGAlikethis 3 points ago +6 / -3

No offense, but this approach leads to a big waste of time. And in that time, Socialism creeps in the back door.

Pushing for lock step is what we need. If it needs to be adjusted a little, that's fine. As long as we have free speech, lock step can be corrected a bit when needed. But we have to enforce each other into banding together. That's the only way the majority (us) can win right now.

2
WiseOldOwl 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't disagree, not really. But who is piping the tune you know?

additionally, we can expect anyone who stands out to start getting a GREAT DEAL of pressure. That means we need to be able to be super flexible as voices are taken from us.

-1
MAGAlikethis -1 points ago +2 / -3

BLM never needed a leader and look at the size of their force.

The only thing that needs to happen is a constant push. One step at a time. And in my opinion, it needs to start with removing face masks. Once we can accomplish this, we can move forward on an actual united front. The hardest step in this case, is the first one.

5
ZhouBai-Den 5 points ago +6 / -1

BLM definitely has leaders.

-1
MAGAlikethis -1 points ago +2 / -3

Wrong. BLM is an ideology and does not need leaders. Any "leader" of BLM can be lost and as long as there is enough money behind the efforts, it will continue.