4186
Comments (574)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
162
B4S3D-P4TR10T 162 points ago +172 / -10

Building 7

42
JD12 42 points ago +48 / -6

This

52
StrongPeacemaker 52 points ago +62 / -10

the thing that gets me is how all the towers fell straight down - you would think they would fall a couple of degrees off center at least...

Oh yeah, and the pentagon's $2.3 trillion that went missing announced on 9/10

29
HerrBBQ 29 points ago +56 / -27

I'm extremely confident in saying that the way the Twin Towers fell is entirely explainable by their shoddy 70s new age construction. Remember, their structural stability relied on the outer web of steel, not a steel and concrete core like most skyscrapers. The heat of the fires caused the steel that supported the floors to deform and sag (not melt!), which pulled the outer web of steel inwards. The stress of being bent and pulled in by the sagging floors while having to support the rest of the building above caused the outer steel at those floors to break at some points. When some of these beams broke, it increased the load on surrounding beams, which also broke. Eventually there wasn't enough strength to support the rest of the building above, so the entire thing catastrophically fell down into the next floor, which instantly failed, leading to a chain reaction.

Building 7 was sketchy as fuck. "Pull it"

57
RichyCunningHAAM 57 points ago +59 / -2

You just have to see the fact that when a large number of the hijackers couldn’t get approved for visas, the cia station chief in Saudi Arabia forced the state department to issue them.

His name was John Brennan.

28
TDS_Consultant 28 points ago +34 / -6

Even soft buckled steel causes resistance to the falling mass above. This little resistance would be enough to cause the off tilt top mass to rotate. Regardless of construction, buildings constructed of steel on and concrete don't instantly convert into zero structural resistance dust almost instantly.

13
Slap_A_Commie06 13 points ago +16 / -3

Nah those towers were built to last. They were built to survive major earthquakes and hurricane force winds. Jet fuel doesn’t burn hot enough to melt the steel used in the construction of the twin towers. Also George Bush’s cousin recently became the CEO of the security company that was contracted to protect the towers. 2 weeks before the attack the did a so called security update on the software and cameras within the tower. Think of that what u will. Also why did they sell all the scrap steel to China after the attack during the clean allowing no scientist to examine the steel. That’s just a drop in the bucket of info we were never told.

12
prayinpede 12 points ago +14 / -2

I saw an interview of fire fighters that took place maybe a year or 2 after. One fireman said he saw molten steel flowing down "it looked like a foundry" were his words.

8
QueenMAGA 8 points ago +8 / -0

I never went down this rabbit hole. What happened with building 7?

14
intellectual-darkweb 14 points ago +17 / -3

Reached free fall. Only one way a skyscraper reaches free fall.

13
prayinpede 13 points ago +13 / -0

Tom Petty?

1
IcyHue 1 point ago +4 / -3

Everything but skyscrapers tends to reach free fall.

The physics don't apply to skyscrapers because jet fuel. The more you know.

12
Kongol626 12 points ago +14 / -2

See I don't believe the official 911 report and I am not stupid even my high school and college physics teachers told me to not believe it. Altho they couldn't publicly state their opinion in fear of getting fired.

What bothers me is RUDY GIULIANI. I always thought he was scumbag for not looking at the evidence instead they grabbed all of it and shipped it away and sold it to china really quick. All the steal and proof gone. Never liked him because of that. Now he's Trump's lawyer and I am starting to like that guy but my heart still can't drop what he did when he was Mayor. I realized I will never truly trust any politician 100%

5
WakeUpWorld 5 points ago +5 / -0

Always was bothered we were supposed to trust him because of 9/11. He never went to his Command Center that day just like Silverstein never went to his daily ritual stop by Windows of the World

2
Pb82_Awards 2 points ago +4 / -2

Yeah I had always hated him bc of 9/11. He was def involved.

4
playful 4 points ago +4 / -0

Some might ask, how in the world could the Secretary of Defense attack the Pentagon in front of its people?

2
Crimson_Identity 2 points ago +7 / -5

Theory : 2.3 trillion missing for newly minted Space Force, recently declassed by President Trump?

Simply speculation

9
deleted 9 points ago +11 / -2
24
Checkout 24 points ago +29 / -5

Fire/explosion proof passports

19
MookMook 19 points ago +19 / -0

I still love that a piece of evidence was a fuel soaked passport of a terrorist 🤣🤣🤣🤣

7
DonaldWashington 7 points ago +8 / -1

Like JFKs magic bullet lol

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

How convenient

7
Pb82_Awards 7 points ago +7 / -0

The building was fucking vaporized but passports are made of the strongest material on earth: a proprietary blend of deep state lies and propaganda.

3
IcyHue 3 points ago +3 / -0

After the impact it was literally snowing paper from every burst window. You could see it everywhere. Why not a fucking passport as well?

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

One. Only one escaped the plane, and landed where it was conveniently "found." And it "just happened" ro be from one of the hijackers.

That was let into the Country by John Brennan, because he couldn't get in without some pull.

2
lurker777 2 points ago +2 / -0

Urban Moving Systems!

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait, that's the name of the company that did what?

2
lurker777 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ryan Dawson is the expert on it. Look up his content.

Urban Moving Systems was almost certainly the front company for Israeli agents who shadowed (if not assisted) the hijackers.

Aside from the ridiculousness of Jews doing manual labor in a foreign country, they all had flights to different parts of the world the day after the attack.

15
DeplorableBro 15 points ago +22 / -7

It was that (WTC-7) that made me question all of it, but sadly it still took me a couple of years.

7
prayinpede 7 points ago +10 / -3

The pilots were big for me. I saw one that was a flight instructor for 747s and 727s. One night after classes he said

1st: Hey lets set up 9/11

2nd: huh

1st: lets set up the flight path of the planes for 9/11

2nd: ok

After flighting combat missions in Vietnam, flighing 747s and 727s commercially for 20 years and teching in simulators for seversl after that. It took him 23 attempts to hit the tower in the simulation.

0
PraiseBeToScience 0 points ago +4 / -4

lmao this story is so utterly, completely full of absolute shit.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right because anything you didn't witness firsthand didn't happen.

That's not how science works.

0
IcyHue 0 points ago +2 / -2

23 times in a simulation? Bet your ass it took the 9/11 pilots way more attempts than that to learn it. During flight lessons they explicitly asked to train flying curves, never asked to learn how to land a plane though. Imagine that... What's wrong with a teacher who doesn't think that's suspicious af?

4
ghost_of_aswartz 4 points ago +5 / -1

That's why the media blacked it out until around 2005-2006

5
1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

The most relevant comment here

5
Darkheartisland 5 points ago +9 / -4

UA 93 was a no show.

6
QueenMAGA 6 points ago +7 / -1

Could it be 93 got shot down by US and the hero story was created as a cove?

6
SurfingUSA 6 points ago +6 / -0

^ This. Also go to the Flight 93 Memorial near Shanksville PA to see some third-rate gaslighting on what happened.

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Please explain.

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

What about the phone calls and testimony from people in those calls?

4
QueenMAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

I never believed 9/11 was a conspiracy. Only considering after all these past few years has shown us. The whole event was so upsetting and horrible I never took a closer look

Were phone calls from the plane released?

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +2 / -1

No, because there was no standard at the time to have armed fighters on standby. Fighters were scrambled to intercept but they were unarmed.

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +0 / -0

If that's true it's stupid af. Do we still have no radar covering our east coast?

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

What does that mean?

1
Darkheartisland 1 point ago +1 / -0

UA 93 was meant for building 7

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dang they were really far off course! The rest of the pilots aced their test.