The pilots were big for me. I saw one that was a flight instructor for 747s and 727s. One night after classes he said
1st: Hey lets set up 9/11
2nd: huh
1st: lets set up the flight path of the planes for 9/11
2nd: ok
After flighting combat missions in Vietnam, flighing 747s and 727s commercially for 20 years and teching in simulators for seversl after that. It took him 23 attempts to hit the tower in the simulation.
The very first plane to hit was AAL11 which was a straight-in approach, without any maneuvers. u/prayinpede fucking lied that it took them "23 attempts" to do. It would've taken literally one - you aim directly at it.
You mongoloids will always doubt thousands of experts but always believe anyone who claims to be one who supports your bullshit. Every fucking pilot in the world could disagree and you'll cling to your one anecdote, and then fluff up their credentials in a pathetic 'Appeal to Authority' fallacy. FlYiNg CoMbAt MiSsIoNs In ViEtNaM?!?!! OmG!!!!!!1!one! Oh, we can play that game: None of the aircraft involved were 727s or 747s, so this fucking Boomer's credentials mean nothing. There. That's how it works, right?
You will latch onto bullshit that makes your theories make LESS sense, not MORE. What the fuck is the implication that these flight paths were impossible? We literally have video of them hitting the towers. What, was this a fucking hologram projected onto some kind of different plane? Is that what the suggestion here is?
You invent explanations in your head without any research, and then spend your lives cherrypicking "evidence" to prove it. Anything that contradicts you is literally discarded outright. And you'll believe anything that supports you, no matter how fucking flimsy or how much non-proof there is for it. In this case, some faggot Boomer shares a secondhand story about a fictional instructor claiming the flight paths were impossible.
It's funny how you shitheads will "question everything", yet I'm supposed to take it on nothing but FAITH that this little anecdote, that he provided zero proof ever happened, has no evidence that is true, and based on the way he told the story was clearly secondhand, is true? So I'm allowed to question the official narrative, but not the shit that some hentai-jerking obese blob working at Arby's spews onto the internet?
I thought you were "looking for answers" and "just asking questions", what part of his typed-at-a-4th-grade-level little fairy tale there was so compelling that you think any part of it was fucking true?
Was it the part where it makes absolutely zero sense, or did you somehow not manage to think about what the implication could possibly be that these maneuvers are impossible? I thought you conspiracy theorist folks were the smartest people on the planet, smarter than literally anyone who plotted 9/11, and you didn't even consider that?
23 times in a simulation? Bet your ass it took the 9/11 pilots way more attempts than that to learn it.
During flight lessons they explicitly asked to train flying curves, never asked to learn how to land a plane though. Imagine that... What's wrong with a teacher who doesn't think that's suspicious af?
It was that (WTC-7) that made me question all of it, but sadly it still took me a couple of years.
The pilots were big for me. I saw one that was a flight instructor for 747s and 727s. One night after classes he said
1st: Hey lets set up 9/11
2nd: huh
1st: lets set up the flight path of the planes for 9/11
2nd: ok
After flighting combat missions in Vietnam, flighing 747s and 727s commercially for 20 years and teching in simulators for seversl after that. It took him 23 attempts to hit the tower in the simulation.
lmao this story is so utterly, completely full of absolute shit.
Right because anything you didn't witness firsthand didn't happen.
That's not how science works.
So are you saying the jets were fake? Some 90s version of a deep fake video sent out to all private broadcasters?
The very first plane to hit was AAL11 which was a straight-in approach, without any maneuvers. u/prayinpede fucking lied that it took them "23 attempts" to do. It would've taken literally one - you aim directly at it.
You mongoloids will always doubt thousands of experts but always believe anyone who claims to be one who supports your bullshit. Every fucking pilot in the world could disagree and you'll cling to your one anecdote, and then fluff up their credentials in a pathetic 'Appeal to Authority' fallacy. FlYiNg CoMbAt MiSsIoNs In ViEtNaM?!?!! OmG!!!!!!1!one! Oh, we can play that game: None of the aircraft involved were 727s or 747s, so this fucking Boomer's credentials mean nothing. There. That's how it works, right?
You will latch onto bullshit that makes your theories make LESS sense, not MORE. What the fuck is the implication that these flight paths were impossible? We literally have video of them hitting the towers. What, was this a fucking hologram projected onto some kind of different plane? Is that what the suggestion here is?
You invent explanations in your head without any research, and then spend your lives cherrypicking "evidence" to prove it. Anything that contradicts you is literally discarded outright. And you'll believe anything that supports you, no matter how fucking flimsy or how much non-proof there is for it. In this case, some faggot Boomer shares a secondhand story about a fictional instructor claiming the flight paths were impossible.
It's funny how you shitheads will "question everything", yet I'm supposed to take it on nothing but FAITH that this little anecdote, that he provided zero proof ever happened, has no evidence that is true, and based on the way he told the story was clearly secondhand, is true? So I'm allowed to question the official narrative, but not the shit that some hentai-jerking obese blob working at Arby's spews onto the internet?
I thought you were "looking for answers" and "just asking questions", what part of his typed-at-a-4th-grade-level little fairy tale there was so compelling that you think any part of it was fucking true?
Was it the part where it makes absolutely zero sense, or did you somehow not manage to think about what the implication could possibly be that these maneuvers are impossible? I thought you conspiracy theorist folks were the smartest people on the planet, smarter than literally anyone who plotted 9/11, and you didn't even consider that?
23 times in a simulation? Bet your ass it took the 9/11 pilots way more attempts than that to learn it. During flight lessons they explicitly asked to train flying curves, never asked to learn how to land a plane though. Imagine that... What's wrong with a teacher who doesn't think that's suspicious af?
That's why the media blacked it out until around 2005-2006