Have you ever used lighter fluid? Played with fire at all? The jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning. Heat weakens steel a lot.
There is also a big difference between a static load and a dynamic load; the supports weren't designed to hold against the momentum of collapsing floors above them.
"Water can't snap a surfboard! Surfers are liars, I put a Channel Islands 5'11" at the bottom of the deep end of a pool and nothing happened, yet these surfers are claiming water broke their board in half!"
Maybe you don't actually surf, but basically that is the difference between a static load and a dynamic load, being underwater verses being hit by a wave.
I believe there was deep state involvement, but part of their campaign of lies is to put out theories that can be debunked so that the real sleigh of hand is missed. In the case of 9/11, Brenan and friends allowing or coordinating the terrorists to highjack the planes.
I don't know about building 7, that might have been demod, but all eyes were on the big towers so they just had to make the main event believable.
Have you ever used lighter fluid? Played with fire at all? The jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning. Heat weakens steel a lot.
There is also a big difference between a static load and a dynamic load; the supports weren't designed to hold against the momentum of collapsing floors above them.
Popular Mechanics (controlled disinformation) enters the chat.
"Water can't snap a surfboard! Surfers are liars, I put a Channel Islands 5'11" at the bottom of the deep end of a pool and nothing happened, yet these surfers are claiming water broke their board in half!"
Maybe you don't actually surf, but basically that is the difference between a static load and a dynamic load, being underwater verses being hit by a wave.
Have you run simulations? Of WTC 1 or 2?
It really isn't very complicated.
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/docs/documents/1353/temperature-strength-metals.png
I believe there was deep state involvement, but part of their campaign of lies is to put out theories that can be debunked so that the real sleigh of hand is missed. In the case of 9/11, Brenan and friends allowing or coordinating the terrorists to highjack the planes.
I don't know about building 7, that might have been demod, but all eyes were on the big towers so they just had to make the main event believable.