He picks and chooses his own data, and has played both sides of the argument. Fuck that. I stopped when the guy refused to discuss obvious mathematical impossibilities yet claims he “follows the data”. SmRt guy, but wrong and this In my opinion is unforgivable. His assessment of there being a high bar to overturn the election by the courts was correct; there should be a high bar. He was also Correct that the Supreme Court doesn’t want to be in the job of overturning elections. That doesn’t mean that there wasn’t fraud. It just means they didn’t want to touch it. While on the one hand he says it should be investigated, on the other hand he says I’m he hadnt seen enough evidence to overturn. Fuck him.