83
posted ago by NimbleNavigator ago by NimbleNavigator +86 / -3

Translation: "We're having a lot of trouble convincing these people to violently riot, and our crisis actors keep getting recognized."

They are trying to emotionally manipulate you into being a violent mob by calling you complacent , because all the calls for violence and riots have been ignored and recognized as the FBI/CIA Traps that they are.

They're basically the "C'mon do something" meme.

Comments (39)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
BestOfTheMidwest 1 point ago +2 / -1

Except I bet many of the people that went into the capital building were Q people who thought they had received secret cryptic orders from the whitehouse that they were to go there and arrest everybody and save the country. At least the ones who weren't antifa/boog types.

Everybody who didn't fall for the Q bullshit has known that the whole disinformation campaign was intended to make the trump base complacent and passive. I don't mean "not rioting" I mean not organizing anything grass roots, not being proactive on vote integrity, trust the establishment plants within the Trump administration. That's the kind of complacency that Q intended to produce, and it was EXTREMELY successful.

1
NimbleNavigator [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q folks were usually at the forefront of putting pressure on politicians.

Also weird that your entire argument rests on "I bet this is what those Q people thought!"

That is, your entire argument rests on what you perceive nebulous "others" to think.

That is, you just made shit up.

You think if there were real Q researchers at the Capitol, they'd be able to get more photos proving that than all the glamour shots of fake "Q Shaman" Jake Angelis, known for being an agitator at Antifa/BLM events.

1
BestOfTheMidwest 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q folks were usually at the forefront of putting pressure on politicians.

No they weren't. Give even one example.

Also weird that your entire argument rests on "I bet this is what those Q people thought!"

Well, there is the Q guy with zipties, so...

That is, your entire argument rests on what you perceive nebulous "others" to think.

Wow it's almost like a argue with these Q fuckers every day on here.

You think if there were real Q researchers at the Capitol, they'd be able to get more photos proving that than all the glamour shots

There's other examples too, the zip tie guy I already mentioned.

If I had to guess what the makeup of the crowd was? 10-15% antifa/leftist accelerationists who worked with ~15% boogaloo-type accelerationists to organize and plan the thing, and 20% livestreamers, and ~50% Qtards.

Think about it, these are the people who were not there to see or listen to Trump. These are not the typical maga crowd, but the media is spinning it that way.

Jealous of your username.

1
NimbleNavigator [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Provide proof that the ziptie guy was legit and not just a Patsy.

1
BestOfTheMidwest 1 point ago +1 / -0

Provide proof that any of them are legit and not just a patsy.