No. There's no indication of that. The Twitter account and this title are making assumptions with no evidence. They pulled that 10% figure out of their ass.
Your attempted snark makes no sense, the left breaks law daily, the Military does not however.
The moment a leftist twit approached any Military Commander asking for that it would be denied immediately and reports possibly sent to the IG or other Command channels explaining the improper/illegal request. Commanders have to do those sorts of things because if they fail to report the criminal contact they may themselves end up being part of the investigation, bad for careers.
Several Military Commanders have already gone on record as denying the possibility of questioning Troops in such a manner.
Raise your sights, snark isn't your forte, try logic maybe.
Exactly. The title and twitter post are taking wild guesses. There's nothing in the article that mentions 10%, any screening program, etc. It most likely is based on recommendations from COs as well as taking those who work in law enforcement in their day jobs first.
That’s not what the military does or how they operate. This is BS being spread by the MSM. The military is not gonna go around asking soldiers their political preference.
US Marshalls? That's unusual. What changes does this make toward their obligations and duties? Let's dig in and find out.
WASHINGTON, Jan. 17, 2021 — Chief Deputy U.S. Marshal Lamont Ruffin from U. S. District of Columbia District Court swears in 2,000 National Guard troops as Special Deputy U.S. Marshals prior to the upcoming presidential inauguration. Deputation gives the guardsmen temporary, limited, law enforcement authority pertaining specifically to the safety and protection of the inauguration and related events.
Ahh, there it is. They are now able to arrest. So the regular NG has not been given the authority to arrest or detain citizens. That's important information, even if Reuters is the one to say it. Nowhere in the article does it say anything about 10% of troops being eligible, only that swore in 2,000.
The twitter account is trying to make this sound like these are Biden's special security officers when there is no evidence of that. Nor does it say what the criteria was, so we don't know if appointments were based on political affiliation, recommendations by officers, a lottery draft, etc. Keep that in mind.
I have a feeling these marshalls will play a large part in whatever is to come in the next two days.
So, is this saying that these 2000 Guard Deputies the hard-core leftist of the Guard?
No. There's no indication of that. The Twitter account and this title are making assumptions with no evidence. They pulled that 10% figure out of their ass.
This is how Biden installs his own special police.
Horsefeathers, no political screening was done, that would be illegal.
https://kekpe.pe/i/60059df28a316.jpg
Yes, because the left never breaks the law.....🤣🤣
Your attempted snark makes no sense, the left breaks law daily, the Military does not however.
The moment a leftist twit approached any Military Commander asking for that it would be denied immediately and reports possibly sent to the IG or other Command channels explaining the improper/illegal request. Commanders have to do those sorts of things because if they fail to report the criminal contact they may themselves end up being part of the investigation, bad for careers.
Several Military Commanders have already gone on record as denying the possibility of questioning Troops in such a manner.
Raise your sights, snark isn't your forte, try logic maybe.
https://kekpe.pe/i/6005ada96d66e.png
Exactly. The title and twitter post are taking wild guesses. There's nothing in the article that mentions 10%, any screening program, etc. It most likely is based on recommendations from COs as well as taking those who work in law enforcement in their day jobs first.
In other words, were the 10% deputized those that voted for Biden???
That’s not what the military does or how they operate. This is BS being spread by the MSM. The military is not gonna go around asking soldiers their political preference.
2,000 is more than enough to round up the conspirators. The rest just need to sit and watch how it's done.
So 2k Biden NG and 28k+ NG for Trump?
US Marshalls? That's unusual. What changes does this make toward their obligations and duties? Let's dig in and find out.
Ahh, there it is. They are now able to arrest. So the regular NG has not been given the authority to arrest or detain citizens. That's important information, even if Reuters is the one to say it. Nowhere in the article does it say anything about 10% of troops being eligible, only that swore in 2,000.
The twitter account is trying to make this sound like these are Biden's special security officers when there is no evidence of that. Nor does it say what the criteria was, so we don't know if appointments were based on political affiliation, recommendations by officers, a lottery draft, etc. Keep that in mind.
I have a feeling these marshalls will play a large part in whatever is to come in the next two days.
All you military and LEO pedes can look forward to purging in the new Harris/Biden administration to make way for new woke recruits.
Upvote for linking to nitter instead of twitter.
Will never link to Twitter again. Nitter doesn't always work, I take screenshots if it doesn't
If nitter is having trouble, there are a bunch of other instances that do the same thing:
https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/wiki/Instances
This is how we win the battle against big tech.
How is this allowed? How are they able to just check who voted for who? Highly unConstitutional