876
Comments (24)
sorted by:
36
Dreadnot 36 points ago +36 / -0

Hypothetically, if armed resistance is required you shouldn't organize it online.

Hypothetically.

17
Not_your_King [S] 17 points ago +18 / -1

I agree, but not everyone is that smart. Hell I find myself fighting back the urge just to vent how I wish [omitted for legal purposes] would happen to [omitted for legal purposes].

8
SpezIsANazisCumRag 8 points ago +9 / -1

Alright well, with the risk of looking like a spook.

How would a patriot in the modern era who has no friends or family and does not socialize in the real world be able to form or join a resistance movement without the use of the internet?

5
Forty_Five 5 points ago +7 / -2

Nice try spook

5
Dreadnot 5 points ago +5 / -0

First step is to understand that the way you are(not a dig, I'm that way too) is not an accident. They want us alone, isolated from a support structure and dependent on the state.

You have one of two options, hypothetically.

  1. Find small ways to resist irl by yourself. Things like street art and provocative posters around town. More legally, get in touch with your creative side and start writing stories with themes you believe in. We need to make ground in the culture war. Learn a trade and make some money- the stronger the individual the stronger the whole.

  2. Start talking about your beliefs. Network with like minded individuals. Join the local militia.

2
x79q3pb 2 points ago +2 / -0

The underground portion of a common ground cover, friend.

1
FuckYouAsWell 1 point ago +2 / -1

FBI shills are fucking retarded.

But oh boy where on earth could you find other gun owners? Maybe a gun range?

For the non fbi fucktards. Extreme vetting is necessary. Don't just go telling everyone everything. And ultimately don't trust anyone blindly.

You're isolated because you choose to be. Turn off the TV. Go to a range, and engage in other hobie's.

11
deleted 11 points ago +13 / -2
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Forty_Five 3 points ago +3 / -0

They have one job:

  1. Discredit
  2. Misdirect
  3. Distract
  4. Demoralize
  5. Dissuade
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
4
JigglesV 4 points ago +5 / -1

Doomer here, YUP

8
ProphetOfKek 8 points ago +8 / -0

I don’t criticize doomers or hopium addicts. We are all in the dark, we’ll know soon enough what’s happening.

5
JigglesV 5 points ago +5 / -0

Or not happening :(

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Not_your_King [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

Nothing wrong with being a doomer at this point. Any Trump supporter has the right to doom.

3
AlohaChris 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nobody wants violence, nobody wants to see the destruction and death that accompanies it. We want legitimate peaceful change, but what forces the government to respect our “rights” in the first place?

When the government ignores them, when they trample them, what ill will befall them? Who will stop them?

We all know the answer here is simple, but we don’t want to admit it, because we see violence as reserved for the gravest extreme.

2
MasterOfIllusions 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not to worry. When this gets far enough along, the distinction won't matter so much anymore.

2
SpezIsANazisCumRag 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tell me about it... (check my post history)

2
Formerlurker92 2 points ago +2 / -0

As is the goal of destabilizing campaigns

1
deplorable333 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol!

1
TheWinningNeverStops 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've been called a shill and spook for saying they need to be removed by peaceful force and minecrafted. Instead people want to talk about voting them out and other stupid stuff like petitions. This country is fucked.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0