There is no asymptomatic "case" of any virus, only asymptomatic infection. A "case" used to mean you were admitted to the hospital. That changed in 2020.
Except the CDC commissioned a pseudo-scientific study in JAMA that said that 59% of transmission was asymptomatic, and the MSM started blaring out that bullshit. What they don't say is that it was just a meta "study" making assumptions based on 6 other papers, which also made assumptions. No human testing or actual patients in the study. No IRB or peer review on the study.
Couple that with the "70% more contagious" bullshit, and we have another year of our commie overlords controlling the planet. It will never end.
My mom got it, had symptoms for a week or so, lingering brain fog for another week. My dad and brother who did not quarantine from her did feel sick but only for maybe an hour. I don't live with them but I had a similar experience and was really confused by it until they told me what they experienced a few weeks later.
There is no asymptomatic "case" of any virus, only asymptomatic infection. A "case" used to mean you were admitted to the hospital. That changed in 2020.
Asymptomatic spread has largely been proven to be false.
And? I didnt mention asymptomatic spread. I said asympyomatic infection. As in, you have it but show no symptoms.
Correct.
Long my suspicion that the greater number of those cases were false positives. I very rarely say all or never, but I suspect these are most of them.
Here is your source: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
Who is that guy? Isnt his first name Louder?
No, that’s the guy who travels with him.
And at least some of the symptomatic cases were just the fucking flu.
The PCR test is unreliable and the inventor of the PCR test is not a fan of Fauci. https://youtu.be/2SFuaQP0vQc
They exist, they just aren't very contagious, if at all.
but yes, most, if not a super majority, are false positives.
Except the CDC commissioned a pseudo-scientific study in JAMA that said that 59% of transmission was asymptomatic, and the MSM started blaring out that bullshit. What they don't say is that it was just a meta "study" making assumptions based on 6 other papers, which also made assumptions. No human testing or actual patients in the study. No IRB or peer review on the study.
Couple that with the "70% more contagious" bullshit, and we have another year of our commie overlords controlling the planet. It will never end.
Comes down to the difference between “cases” and “infections”. The media are conflating the two.
Historically, infections include the people who have the virus in their system but not enough to be symptomatic or contagious.
“Cases” typically refers only to those with symptoms.
The media are purposely using “cases” to describe “infections”, thus dramatically increasing fear.
Nope.
2 things can be true.
False positives: ✅
Asymptomatic cases: ✅
"Case" = Infection causing an immune response resulting in antibody production, with or without symptoms.
they don't even have a good match for the test. Its like saying "Yup, its a CAR"
hahah! Yes!
I miss Crowder
It would explain why there's zero connection to Asymptomatic persons and passing on the virus. Via Florida study.
My mom got it, had symptoms for a week or so, lingering brain fog for another week. My dad and brother who did not quarantine from her did feel sick but only for maybe an hour. I don't live with them but I had a similar experience and was really confused by it until they told me what they experienced a few weeks later.
Asymptomatic is newspeak for healthy.
How about presymptomatic?