So this shows that clearly 230 was a part of their calculations with respect to their banning the President of the United States’ speech as an individual.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkQgTY5_cF0
Moreover, it further shows that Section 230 is absolutely a threat to our national security. Like seriously? Now "Twitter" aka the Deep State, gets to decide how to control what is happening in the United States? ... Twitter knows better than the duly elected President of the United States?
When they chose to refuse to address the President of the United States' concerns with the national security threat of Section 230 in the NDAA it shows that if "they" {i.e. the Deeps State, Congress, and Big Tech} can do that to the President of the United States as an individual, then they can and intend to do that to the entire country. ...basically "suspend" the 1st Amendment of the United States, permanently. How did they get this "power"? Via congress by not removing section 230 from the NDAA.
So this shows that clearly 230 was a part of their calculations with respect to their banning the President of the United States’ speech as an individual.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkQgTY5_cF0
Moreover, it further shows that Section 230 is absolutely a threat to our national security. Like seriously? Now "Twitter" aka the Deep State, gets to decide how to control what is happening in the United States? ... Twitter knows better than the duly elected President of the United States?
When they chose to refuse to address the President of the United States' concerns with the national security threat of Section 230 in the NDAA it shows that if "they" {i.e. the Deeps State, Congress, and Big Tech} can do that to the President of the United States as an individual, then they can and *intend to* do that to the entire country. ...basically "suspend" the 1st Amendment of the United States, permanently. How did they get this "power"? Via **congress** by not removing section 230 from the NDAA.
According to the 2018 EO the US has the right to seize organizations that participate in propaganda during the foreign interference of an election. Jack Dorsey, on the Project Veritas tapes admits going after Trump
Dorsey is aiding and abetting foreign enemies, colluding and like conspiring ( with Google, Facebook, everything else) to commit treason.
This is gonna be great and they will all get fucked in the azz. Be patient
All of congress are traitors. Thats what it means plain and simple.
stocks will slide further as we get our own platform...
...Just in case anyone's wondering what deleted 47hours (he minted his account at the exact time that I made this post} said:
47hours: I didn't realize Twitter was the only way to communicate now. Very odd.
Brendallania: Doesn't matter ...Twitter is violating the First Amendment of the Constitution and because of Section 230 we citizens can not sue them, thus, they are "legally" allowed to suspend the First Amendment rights of anyone they choose to without limits, because congress said so.
47hours: No they aren't. The First applies to the government. Not to private industry. JFC.
Brendallania: The First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." …
47hours: Yep. Congress made no law stopping communication. If you're trying to make the idiotic leap that 230 is somehow an infringement due to it being a law you really need to go back to school. A newspaper can refuse to print an opinion piece. Is that infringement? Idiotic people. Always looking for persecution.
Brendallania: Geeze @47hours ... It almost looks like you initiated your freshly minted account just just to talk to me ... how precious.
47hours: Nope. Just one of the first threads I hit.
Brendallania: ...Must of hit pretty close to the mark to get you all riled up like that ....
Brendallania: Just curious ... 47 hours to what? ... Oh! Your new supreme leader.
47hours: Just trying to be a voice of reason in this delusional safe space.
Brendallania: Delusional is characterized by or holding idiosyncratic {means individual} beliefs or impressions that are contradicted by reality or rational argument, typically as a symptom of mental disorder … so, in applying “delusional” to “safe space” you are really just committing the same faux pas {means “an embarrassing or tactless act or remark in a social situation”} as you did when you misinterpreted the First Amendment of the United States Constitution as it applies to Section 230 … I’m not surprised … no snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible.
{Then he deleted his account.}
I think it is important to remember that this is the enemy and this is who is voting these guys into office.
Give away USA
Doesn't matter ...Twitter is violating the First Amendment of the Constitution and because of Section 230 we citizens can not sue them, thus, they are "legally" allowed to suspend the First Amendment rights of anyone they choose to without limits, because congress said so.
The First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
...
Geeze @47hours ... It almost looks like you initiated your freshly minted account just just to talk to me ... how precious.
...Must of hit pretty close to the mark to get you all riled up like that ....
Just curious ... 47 hours to what? ... Oh! Your new supreme leader.