"Evidence used to conduct this assessment includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations, testimony in a variety of state venues, published analyses by think tanks and legal centers, videos and photos, public comments, and extensive press coverage" - I would be very unhappy if that was the standard of proof used to convict me or find me liable for anything, wouldn't you? "Mr Magalorian; the entire neighbor (which doesn't like you because of your MAGA banner) swears they've seen underage girls enter your house so we pronounce you guilty of ...."
Old news with just numbers on a spreadsheet - that is not enough.
Given that the numbers are factual, why is that not enough?
"Evidence used to conduct this assessment includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations, testimony in a variety of state venues, published analyses by think tanks and legal centers, videos and photos, public comments, and extensive press coverage" - I would be very unhappy if that was the standard of proof used to convict me or find me liable for anything, wouldn't you? "Mr Magalorian; the entire neighbor (which doesn't like you because of your MAGA banner) swears they've seen underage girls enter your house so we pronounce you guilty of ...."
False premise