187
Comments (80)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Awakened 1 point ago +1 / -0

Eh, you’re a smart guy, but the orchid thing is stupid.

Healthy genes are healthy genes.

The more healthy genes the better.

Their is nothing wrong with that image. It’s just a marketing photo shoot with two models. They’re both probably gay.

Race mixing ain’t good or bad, it just is.

Healthy genes are healthy genes.

The more healthy genes the better.

2
DoubleEagle 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not stupid, it puts a ceiling. Once we have an agreed ceiling and a floor can something be discussed.

What is a healthy gene? Is sickle cell a healthy gene?

Is it a good situation where neither parent can be a donor to the child? This implies a more significant genetic difference from parent to child. All those genes not in common, why are they assumed to be good genes? What if they are recessive, bad genes in the parents, but have no counterpart in the child, leading to incomplete dominance of otherwise recessive traits?

Coincidentally, this is exactly what happens.

1
Awakened 1 point ago +1 / -0

Parents not being able to be donors to a child happens when they are the same race as well. Also, you can be a donor to your child when you aren’t the same ‘race’.

Since you refuse to define race then we are discussing air.

You are picking outlier instances and pretending they are the rule when the genetics match your preference, but ignoring the same when they genetics don’t.

Everything you’re saying happens when the parents are the same ‘race’.

Everything you say happens when the parents are of different ‘races’

Define race or stop replying or don’t define race and I won’t reply back.

We use to call race tribes. We use to freak out about tribes mixing. Yet we wouldn’t consider the difference between southern and northern England people a big deal anymore. At one time, it was everything to those people. Welcome to the now.

1
DoubleEagle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Define race or stop replying or don’t define race and I won’t reply back.

I don't debate postmodernist ideologues.

1
Awakened 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought you deserved one last post since you have been very sincere, but this will be the last.

I don’t even know what that term postmordernwhatzi is. You may ask yourself if you are a slave to terminology and the need to put people in nice neat little boxes.

Race is a horrible way to try and process the subject of genetics. I bet you even went and tried to find a real definition and knowledge on the subject and found it couldn’t answer my questions.

Because race is a super old outdated concept. Genetics is the modern equivalent. Kind of like Alchemy versus chemistry or astrology versus astronomy.

That was my point.

Have a great day and thank you for your time.