Just what "shit" are you referring to? That a pede sees something new on Rudy Giuliani's Telegram channel that he has never seen before and though it might be of interest for people on the Donald to look into? You mean that shit? Or should everyone run everything they want to share by you first, just to make sure is it accurate or not? AND... NOTICE THE HEADLINE......
TONS of people, me included, have accidentally reco’d some damn Telegram acct that’s not even the person, lol.
Don’t be defensive - People are telling you that it’s not Rudy’s channel, cuz he’s only on Twitter. If you can show otherwise then help out your fellow pedes and show it.
The concept might be true, but it’s not sourced: The Telegram Rudy channel is fake.
If it can’t be verified as being reposted from Rudy’s ACTUAL acct, then it’s just some 8kun larp bs - and you’re propagating it.
I wish they would just say it like you just did then. I went thru the posts on that channel, and it is just comprised of forwards of other MAGA accts, so it is probably fake. Thanks for the direct heads up.
I know. Everybody’s on edge + internet = they all appear to be dicks.
When I found out that SPowell’s Telegram was fake, I posted a “Hey, it’s fake” post (because I was still seeing people post directly from the fake acct). I’m glad I posted the warning, but I got a few “Great, post this for the millionth time” comments, lol.
I guess the logic on the fake accts is that it would be easy to mirror the real Twitter acct for a while, then start gaming it when you’ve got a few thousand follows.
When I posted my 1 warning, somebody mentioned that one of the fake Sidney Powell accts has like 200k (I think that’s what he said) followers. Yikes - it’s probably people like our grandparents or aunts following, and if the fake acct owner posts some “we’ve been nuked by chyna” shit, I just feel bad for the normies, ya know?
I think that’s why everyone’s trying to limit the risk of the fake accts.
Just what "shit" are you referring to? That a pede sees something new on Rudy Giuliani's Telegram channel that he has never seen before and though it might be of interest for people on the Donald to look into? You mean that shit? Or should everyone run everything they want to share by you first, just to make sure is it accurate or not? AND... NOTICE THE HEADLINE......
TONS of people, me included, have accidentally reco’d some damn Telegram acct that’s not even the person, lol.
Don’t be defensive - People are telling you that it’s not Rudy’s channel, cuz he’s only on Twitter. If you can show otherwise then help out your fellow pedes and show it.
The concept might be true, but it’s not sourced: The Telegram Rudy channel is fake. If it can’t be verified as being reposted from Rudy’s ACTUAL acct, then it’s just some 8kun larp bs - and you’re propagating it.
I wish they would just say it like you just did then. I went thru the posts on that channel, and it is just comprised of forwards of other MAGA accts, so it is probably fake. Thanks for the direct heads up.
I know. Everybody’s on edge + internet = they all appear to be dicks.
When I found out that SPowell’s Telegram was fake, I posted a “Hey, it’s fake” post (because I was still seeing people post directly from the fake acct). I’m glad I posted the warning, but I got a few “Great, post this for the millionth time” comments, lol.
I guess the logic on the fake accts is that it would be easy to mirror the real Twitter acct for a while, then start gaming it when you’ve got a few thousand follows.
When I posted my 1 warning, somebody mentioned that one of the fake Sidney Powell accts has like 200k (I think that’s what he said) followers. Yikes - it’s probably people like our grandparents or aunts following, and if the fake acct owner posts some “we’ve been nuked by chyna” shit, I just feel bad for the normies, ya know?
I think that’s why everyone’s trying to limit the risk of the fake accts.
appreciate you, pede👊