Why won't he tell us if Seth Rich had anything to do with the DNC hacks? If he did have something to do with the hacks, then he let the DNC, and feds, cover up a massive crime.
Him saying basically nothing also fed the narrative created by the DNC, Hilary Clinton, Obama, the FBI, Comey, Stzrok, Mueller, the MSM, etc, that "Trump colluded with Russia" to "steal the election"..... which all those people knew was false, but Assange wouldn't tell the public where the emails came from...... Which meant that the Deep State and MSM narrative is what all the stupid normies believed.
O.K., so let's say it really was Seth Rich that gave him all the emails.
You're telling me that Julian is still "protecting" Seth, even though he knows that he was murdered because of what he did? That it's better to cover up the truth about his source's murder, which would be one the biggest political crimes in US history, which would bring down the whole DNC establishment, just to "protect" a murdered source? What's left to protect? They murdered him!
Do you really think the politically murdered source (Seth Rich) would want the crime against him covered up? He was trying to expose the DNC, and they killed him...... and you think his dying wish would be to have it covered up? Seth was just trying to tell people that the DNC rigged a primary, but you think he'd now like Assange to help cover up his murder, by the same people? Rigging a primary is one thing, but murdering a staffer for leaking is a whole nother thing entirely!
Just imagine how different the world would be today, if Assange gave us the proof that Seth Rich was the person that "hacked" the DNC...... and he was murdered for it! Biggest Red Pill in human history! No basis for the "Trump - Russia collusion" conspiracy. There would have been no Mueller, to meddle in the 2018 elections. And there would have been a major investigation demanded, into finding out who killed Seth Rich, and why. We would literally be living in a different *world!
I can understand the reasoning, if you show that you can cave and exposed one of your sources, your other ones might not want to deal with you any longer.
I'd wager that is why he is doing it.
Also remember that in this deranged climate Rich's family might be attacked by radicals if he admitted to it.
That is assuming Assange has evidence about Seth Rich's murderer, that might not be the case, he might just have some clues about who did it but nothing solid.
He doesn't have to have any proof of Seth's murder. Because, as of now, Seth didn't give Assange the emails, and he was just murdered during a "botched robbery".
But, if Assange tells the world that Seth did give him the emails, then the whole world knows that he was actually murdered because of it. And since the world isn't that stupid, they know the DNC did it. No "proof" needed.
Everything I'm seeing says Trump won't pardon him. It's disappointing, but apparently the uniparty said they won't convict him after he leaves office if he doesn't pardon Assange.
I don't know why he'd ever trust him to keep their word, so hoping it's not true
Sure they did. None of his leaks have ever been disputed, and they are confirmed by the originators (like the DNC) through their anger and their urgency to censor, cancel, and bury. Facts seldom need confirmation like narratives do, this is why journalists who bring facts to light are so important.
Why won't he tell us if Seth Rich had anything to do with the DNC hacks? If he did have something to do with the hacks, then he let the DNC, and feds, cover up a massive crime.
Him saying basically nothing also fed the narrative created by the DNC, Hilary Clinton, Obama, the FBI, Comey, Stzrok, Mueller, the MSM, etc, that "Trump colluded with Russia" to "steal the election"..... which all those people knew was false, but Assange wouldn't tell the public where the emails came from...... Which meant that the Deep State and MSM narrative is what all the stupid normies believed.
O.K., so let's say it really was Seth Rich that gave him all the emails.
You're telling me that Julian is still "protecting" Seth, even though he knows that he was murdered because of what he did? That it's better to cover up the truth about his source's murder, which would be one the biggest political crimes in US history, which would bring down the whole DNC establishment, just to "protect" a murdered source? What's left to protect? They murdered him!
Do you really think the politically murdered source (Seth Rich) would want the crime against him covered up? He was trying to expose the DNC, and they killed him...... and you think his dying wish would be to have it covered up? Seth was just trying to tell people that the DNC rigged a primary, but you think he'd now like Assange to help cover up his murder, by the same people? Rigging a primary is one thing, but murdering a staffer for leaking is a whole nother thing entirely!
Just imagine how different the world would be today, if Assange gave us the proof that Seth Rich was the person that "hacked" the DNC...... and he was murdered for it! Biggest Red Pill in human history! No basis for the "Trump - Russia collusion" conspiracy. There would have been no Mueller, to meddle in the 2018 elections. And there would have been a major investigation demanded, into finding out who killed Seth Rich, and why. We would literally be living in a different *world!
I can understand the reasoning, if you show that you can cave and exposed one of your sources, your other ones might not want to deal with you any longer.
I'd wager that is why he is doing it.
Also remember that in this deranged climate Rich's family might be attacked by radicals if he admitted to it.
Or maybe you would show that if one of your sources gets suspiciously murdered, you will expose who did it.... so they wouldn't have done it in vain?
That is assuming Assange has evidence about Seth Rich's murderer, that might not be the case, he might just have some clues about who did it but nothing solid.
He doesn't have to have any proof of Seth's murder. Because, as of now, Seth didn't give Assange the emails, and he was just murdered during a "botched robbery".
But, if Assange tells the world that Seth did give him the emails, then the whole world knows that he was actually murdered because of it. And since the world isn't that stupid, they know the DNC did it. No "proof" needed.
Everything I'm seeing says Trump won't pardon him. It's disappointing, but apparently the uniparty said they won't convict him after he leaves office if he doesn't pardon Assange.
I don't know why he'd ever trust him to keep their word, so hoping it's not true
Unfortunately not even Trump knew how deep it was.
He's a journalist. We don't have a dozen journalists left on the planet. And his bravery deserves freedom.
Sure they did. None of his leaks have ever been disputed, and they are confirmed by the originators (like the DNC) through their anger and their urgency to censor, cancel, and bury. Facts seldom need confirmation like narratives do, this is why journalists who bring facts to light are so important.