35
posted ago by Kingofkek ago by Kingofkek +35 / -0

A buddy is asking for a source that the courts never admitted evidence of fraud. I keep telling him how lawsuits were rejected before any evidence was even allowed

Comments (7)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
slag 1 point ago +1 / -0

I want to say the NV case actually entered evidence into the fact record, but the judge punted. I think the state-based WI case did as well (with the ultimate 4-3 ruling). AZ had some court-ordered discovery (e.g. signature verification), which was damning.

Those are the only ones that were allowed to proceed outside of muh standing and muh laches.