The evidence presented to state legislatures in SEVEN different states prompted them to file alternate electors.
Forget all else. The fact that whatever evidence or whatever happened led to SEVEN states submitting alternate electors is historically HUGE.
The fact that, prior to the organized attack on the capitol, some 36 senators and well over a hundred house reps had signed on to object to the seating of the electors, is historically huge.
Even having ONE senator sign on to an objection is historic and extremely rare.
It's common that house members object for posterity for whatever reason looks good for the camera. Happens every election cycle. The threshold necessary for a Senator to sign on is HUGE, and it was smashed with dozens of signatories this cycle.
Elections with no evidence of fraud does not have dozens of Senators objecting.
See, this is the problem. You have created a completely alternative reality. In fact not a single state, not one, presented alternate sets of electors.
If you bothered to listen to the Congressional certification of the EC votes you would have heard Pence going over the submitted slates of electors for every single state. And, in every case, Pence follows the same procedure which includes stating that there is only one set of electors. Take a look at the proceedings here (https://youtu.be/KzWS7gJX5Z8) and you can start at 15:04 when they go over Arizona and explicitly state there was only one slate of electors
Have you been on a different planet for the past 6 months? Those "clowns"were never allowed to present or argue their filings.
That’s not true my friend
The evidence presented to state legislatures in SEVEN different states prompted them to file alternate electors.
Forget all else. The fact that whatever evidence or whatever happened led to SEVEN states submitting alternate electors is historically HUGE.
The fact that, prior to the organized attack on the capitol, some 36 senators and well over a hundred house reps had signed on to object to the seating of the electors, is historically huge.
Even having ONE senator sign on to an objection is historic and extremely rare.
It's common that house members object for posterity for whatever reason looks good for the camera. Happens every election cycle. The threshold necessary for a Senator to sign on is HUGE, and it was smashed with dozens of signatories this cycle.
Elections with no evidence of fraud does not have dozens of Senators objecting.
See, this is the problem. You have created a completely alternative reality. In fact not a single state, not one, presented alternate sets of electors.
If you bothered to listen to the Congressional certification of the EC votes you would have heard Pence going over the submitted slates of electors for every single state. And, in every case, Pence follows the same procedure which includes stating that there is only one set of electors. Take a look at the proceedings here (https://youtu.be/KzWS7gJX5Z8) and you can start at 15:04 when they go over Arizona and explicitly state there was only one slate of electors